AMH is an independent media house free from political ties or outside influence. We have four newspapers: The Zimbabwe Independent, a business weekly published every Friday, The Standard, a weekly published every Sunday, and Southern and NewsDay, our daily newspapers. Each has an online edition.

Feature: Camilla gets it right on carrying ivory rod — anti-ivory use groups don’t

Local News
File pic: Chieftainess Rebecca Banika of Botswana's Pandamatenga Hunting Community

AFRICAN conservationists and a US ivory education specialist have condemned anti-ivory use groups for protesting British Queen Consort Camilla’s determination to carry a rod made of ivory at the coronation of her husband, King Charles, on  May 6, 2023.

In an interview, Botswana Chieftainess Rebecca Banika said, “It’s indeed a good move for the Queen of England to show support for the need to use wildlife products such as ivory.

“We see this as support for communities co-existing with wildlife such as those in elephant-over-populated Botswana.

“We need trade in surplus ivory to help us survive.

“The anti-ivory groups in Western nations continually turn a blind eye to our cries for help.

“They are more interested in soliciting donations so they can enrich themselves and bribe others.”

Chieftainess Banika noted that the fact that Queen Camilla intends to hold an ivory sceptre “gives us hope that ivory is still valued and can be soon acquired by those who can make the best use of it.”

Speaking from Los Angeles, US, the managing director of the Ivory Education Institute, Godfrey Harris, condemned the anti-ivory groups’ protest, calling it “contrived,” a “clumsy way to try to take advantage of a major world event,” and a “shameful” act by groups that claim to be “conservationists.”

Harris said the animal rights groups “purport to support elephant conservation but don’t exhibit any knowledge of the unique cultures of wildlife-rich and elephant over-populated southern Africa.”

“I support the British royal household’s decision to honour history in the use of one of the world’s most precious and most useful materials,” said Harris.

“Where is the evidence of what these publicity-seeking groups have done for wild animals?

“How much have they spent each year on travel and meetings and their own salaries and how much on the animals? Where is the proof that the historic use of ivory “stimulates” the current marketplace?”

Elsewhere, one of Zimbabwe’s fierce lobbyists supporting ivory trade and chairperson of the Hwange Painted Dog Conservation Project, Jerry Gotora, blasted the anti-ivory groups for coming up with a protest that in reality has nothing to do with elephant conservation but everything to do with trying to hijack the coronation of King Charles for fundraising purposes.

“Western hunter-pioneers and miners looted tonnes and tonnes of ivory and gold for European markets just a few years ago — when they had colonial control of Africa’s wildlife.

“The truth is that they wanted ivory and gold from this part of the world for their own benefit and today maintain a straight face when they continue to sponsor policies to maintain that control while selfishly denying us the right to trade in some of these same products for our benefit.

“Over the years, Westerners have killed more wild animals — such as elephants — than modern-day poachers and true to the hypocrisy of the anti-ivory crowd they pretend to be true conservationists,” he said. 

Asked if he considers Queen Camilla’s decision to hold an ivory rod as support for use of ivory by elephant over-populated Sadc countries, Gotora said “no”.

He said historically the use of ivory was generally “not for everyone but for the aristocracy — an open display of a level of greediness and selfishness only they could afford.”

“Remember before independence in Africa, only whites — mostly connected to the royal families in Europe — were allowed to hunt,” said Gotora. “Wildlife was considered Royal Game.”

Harris summed up the current situation, “Deriving value from Africa’s wildlife products and applying that value to long-lasting conservation projects will only occur when someone of authority, somewhere in southern Africa, shows the selfless courage to stand up to the anti-ivory use groups and animal welfare organisations that are today misguiding Cites, the UN’s wildlife trade regulating agency, and select Sadc environmental agencies.

“That individual is urged to approve  pro-sustainable use policies that help elephant-over-populated Sadc countries  reclaim  control of their wildlife from the neo-colonial anti-ivory trade  paralysis that they are stuck in now.”

  • Emmanuel Koro is a Johannesburg-based international award-winning environmental journalist who writes independently on environmental and developmental issues in Africa.

Related Topics