THERE is a reason why limited access to training and technical education is quietly holding back Zimbabwe’s farmers.
For decades, discussions on agricultural productivity have revolved around familiar inputs; improved seed, fertiliser, irrigation infrastructure and access to finance.
These factors are important and frequently dominate policy debates, support programmes and farmer advisory campaigns.
Yet one of the most decisive inputs in modern agriculture receives far less attention — knowledge.
Farming today is no longer a simple matter of planting and harvesting.
It requires a deeper understanding of soils, pests, diseases, climate variability, input management and markets.
Every season presents a series of technical and financial decisions, but across much of our agricultural sector, farmers are expected to make these decisions with limited access to structured education, training and technical guidance.
Agriculture has become a knowledge-intensive industry
- Addressing unfair trade key to transforming African food systems
- Urgent economic structural transformation necessary
- Residents finger ZETDC employees in cables theft
- Residents finger ZETDC employees in cables theft
Keep Reading
Modern agriculture is increasingly defined by information and technical understanding.
Today’s farmer must do far more than simply cultivate land.
They must understand soil fertility dynamics, identify emerging pests and diseases, determine appropriate fertiliser regimes and correct application of chemicals while managing resistance risks.
Climate variability has also added a new layer of complexity, requiring farmers to interpret changing rainfall patterns, temperature fluctuations and water management challenges.
Beyond the field, farmers must also navigate markets — deciding when to plant, what varieties to grow and how to align production with demand.
In essence, the modern farmer, operates at the intersection of science, business and risk management.
Productivity, therefore, depends not only on the availability of inputs, but also on the knowledge required to use them effectively.
When access to training is limited
Despite the growing technical demands of agriculture, structured training and continuous learning opportunities for farmers remain uneven.
Many farmers rely on fragmented advice from neighbours, sporadic extension visits or technical guidance from input suppliers whose primary role is often commercial rather than educational.
In many farming communities, the search for technical guidance now begins not at an extension office, but at the local agro-dealer shop.
Farmers arrive with photos of diseased crops on their phones, asking which chemical to spray or how to mix pesticides.
While agro-dealers play an important role in input distribution, they have quietly become the default technical advisers for many farmers, a role that was never originally designed to replace structured agricultural training.
In the absence of consistent extension support, the agro-dealer counter has become the farmer’s classroom.
Learning through costly mistakes
When knowledge systems are weak, farmers are forced to learn through experience and sometimes through costly trial and error.
This shift has practical consequences in the field.
Many farmers today handle increasingly complex chemical regimes without adequate technical grounding.
Tank mixtures of agro-chemicals are often done based on informal advice rather than agronomic guidance.
Incorrect dosage rates, incompatible chemical combinations and repeated use of the same active ingredients are common.
The result is not only wasted inputs, but sometimes crop damage, resistance development and rising production costs — problems that stem less from farmer negligence and more from gaps in technical knowledge.
Soil management presents another quiet knowledge gap.
Fertiliser recommendations are frequently applied as blanket practices, repeated season after season without the benefit of soil testing or nutrient balancing.
Farmers may invest heavily in inputs without clear understanding of what their soils actually require.
Over time, this leads to declining soil responsiveness and diminishing returns on fertiliser investment.
The broken bridge between research and farmers
Zimbabwe possesses valuable agricultural research capacity.
Universities, research stations and technical institutions continue to generate scientific knowledge on crop management, soil health, pest control and improved production techniques.
Yet transmission of this knowledge to farmers remains inconsistent.
Weak extension systems, limited dissemination platforms and insufficient interaction between researches and farmers often create a gap between scientific discovery and practical application.
As a result, valuable insights generated in laboratories and experimental fields may take years to reach the farmer who need them most.
Perhaps the least visible knowledge gap lies beyond the field — in the market.
Many farmers make planting decisions without reliable information on demand trends, price cycles or market saturation.
Crops that appear profitable one season can quickly become oversupplied the next, leaving farmers exposed to collapsing prices at harvest.
Production knowledge may exist, but market knowledge often lags behind.
As a result, farmers sometimes produce successfully, yet struggle to sell profitably — a reminder that knowledge in agriculture must extend beyond agronomy to include the economics of farming itself.
Knowledge multiplies the power of every other input
Inputs such as fertilisers, seed and irrigation are key drivers of productivity, but their effectiveness ultimately depends on how they are used.
Knowledge determines whether fertiliser is applied at the right time and rate, whether chemicals are used safely and effectively and whether irrigation water is applied efficiently.
A well-informed farmer is better positioned to optimise resources, reduce waste and respond to emerging challenges.
Knowledge improves decision-making and better decisions translate to stronger yields, lower costs and greater resilience to climate and market shocks.
In this sense, knowledge is not simply another input — it is the factor that determines how effectively all other inputs perform.
Re-centring knowledge in agricultural policy
If Zimbabwe’s agricultural sector is to become more productive and resilient, greater attention must be given to strengthening farmer knowledge systems.
This means investing not only in physical inputs and infrastructure, but also in education, training and knowledge dissemination.
Stronger agricultural extension services, expanded farmer training programmes, closer collaborations between researchers and farmers and wider access to practical technical information can significantly improve the quality of decision-making on farms.
Agriculture will always depend on land, water and capital — but in an increasingly complex farming environment, knowledge may prove to be the most valuable input of all.
Without it, even the best seeds, fertiliser and irrigation systems cannot reach their full potential.
