Ex-commercial farmers set new compensation demands


GOVERNMENT has been driven into a tight corner over compensation of white former commercial farmers who lost land during the country’s fast-track land reform programme after the former farmers tabled stringent demands that include cost of land, over and above the improvements done on the farms.

Finance minister Mthuli Ncibe has set aside ZWR$53 million for the compensation of the over 4 000 white former farmers, who lost their land at the turn of the millennium.

The farmers were supposed to be compensated for the developments made on the farm as land belongs to the State under the country’s Constitution.

However, the former farmers have threatened not to cut a deal with government if any compensation being dangled by government does not include the contentious land ownership issue.

Government on Friday pledged to offer advance payments to farmers for losses suffered during the land reform exercise while valuations for a full package for farm improvements are being conducted.

“Government accepts liability for improvements, but not land under the Constitution. The land side is contentious, but needs to be dealt with because title includes both land and improvements,” Commercial Farmers Union president Ben Purcel Gilpin said in an interview yesterday.

“The issue of land is particularly an issue for farmers. Primary asset value was in land. This is that case for cattle ranchers in the Midlands and Matabeleland. We need a way that solves this or there will be no agreement.”

He said the former farm owners were committed to investing their compensation to boost the revival of the agricultural sector, but on condition government guaranteed their rights and protected investments.

“We note that the government is anxious to get the economy going and believe that dealing with the land issue in a way that restores banking confidence will drive recovery.

“This could involve getting former farmers to invest compensation dues in recovery or the like. Many are willing to do this and would hope that as Zimbabweans they would be treated fairly,” Gilpin said.

“All farmers need is an environment that promotes investment that is regardless of whether they are old or new, so a full bundle of rights that ensure access and use as well as the ability to include or exclude others in their business and to sell or pass on or leverage are preferable.”

Do you have a coronavirus story? You can email us on: news@alphamedia.co.zw


  1. how did they get the land ? They forced blacks away from those farms as colonising. To hell with you pigs if you do not like to be paid development of farms only.

  2. Nobleman Runyanga

    The farmers should know that Government’s compensation proposal is based on the Constitution of the country. They cannot try to hold the nation at ransom through thwarting Government’s efforts to address legacy issues so that the country can move forward.

  3. Former white commercial farmers should not continue changing goal posts on what they are supposed to be paid. The Zimbabwean Constitution is clear on Section 295 (3) that there will be no compensation on land but for developments.The farmers should appreciate the speedy with which the new dispensation has moved towards the compensation drive. Historically when the settlers came in 1890 they did not buy the land, they actually grabbed it from natives. Since they did not pay for it they should also not be paid for it, but get compensation on developments done on the farm.

  4. Ignore the former white farmers with the contempt they deserve. Land reform took that turn because of their arrogance.Now they want to exhibit same arrogance…Hell NO.

  5. They are just too racist, foolish, senile, and old to fully understand that what they are being offered is the best now and in the future.

  6. Madirativhange Mukoranebhande

    I think we have been reasonable enough to compensate for developments. Its a HELL NO to pay for our land. That’s an insult to the liberation war and to ALL those who died during that war. They want to be arrogant and difficult. If they insist, don’t pay them at ALL, even the so called deposit. We will rise at some point without them. Nonsense!

Comments are closed.