×
NewsDay

AMH is an independent media house free from political ties or outside influence. We have four newspapers: The Zimbabwe Independent, a business weekly published every Friday, The Standard, a weekly published every Sunday, and Southern and NewsDay, our daily newspapers. Each has an online edition.

I’m too rich to steal: Chihuri

Local News
 “This case is a good example where the Prosecutor-General’s Office did not satisfy these requirements and for that reason this unexplained wealth order was obtained improperly and in an unconstitutional manner and must be set aside. The forfeiture order was obtained unlawfully,” he submitted.

BY DESMOND CHINGARANDE EXILED former police Commissioner-General Augustine Chihuri yesterday told the High Court that he was too rich to steal from the State and the police force.

Chihuri is accused of corruption involving US$32 million.

Through his lawyer Addington Chinake, Chihuri said he acquired his wealth through hard work being gainfully employed as the country’s top cop.

Chihuri’s lawyer told Justice Addington Chinake, that the former police boss was into commercial farming before the November 2017 coup.

“He is not a dubious character who woke up to amass such wealth. It is painful, for example, that the applicant being a beneficiary of the land reform programme was also a farmer producing maize which he sold to the Grain Marketing Board,” Chinake submitted.

Chihuri accused former Prosecutor-General (PG) Kumbirai Hodzi of pursuing a personal vendetta against him.

“This case is a good example where the Prosecutor-General’s Office did not satisfy these requirements and for that reason this unexplained wealth order was obtained improperly and in an unconstitutional manner and must be set aside. The forfeiture order was obtained unlawfully,” he submitted.

Hodzi was granted powers to freeze Chihuri’s properties and assets.

Chihuri said officers, who deposed affidavits against him were not in the service at the time the offence was said to have been committed.

“The court does not balance the interests of the applicants in assets that they say were illegitimately acquired. They cannot be mass forfeiture which is essentially what this case is about. It’s about mass forfeiture, unconnected, unproven just following mere allegations. There has been no regard to the working history and businesses of the applicant.”

The case is continuing on April 2.

  • Follow Desmond on Twitter@DChingarande1

Related Topics