guest column:Surina Esterhuyse
RECENTLY, news reports revealed plans by a Canadian oil and gas company, ReconAfrica, to explore for oil and gas in some of Africa’s most sensitive protected areas. These areas include the Namibian headwaters of the Okavango delta and a world heritage site, Tsodilo Hills, in Botswana. Plans are afoot to explore inside the Kavango-Zambezi trans-frontier conservation area.
Both conventional and unconventional oil and gas are the targets. Conventional oil and gas occur in porous geological formations. Unconventional oil and gas occur in impermeable geological formations and need specialised methods, such as fracking, to extract them.
Fracking is performed via deep wells drilled into the earth. A mixture of sand, water and chemicals is pumped in under high pressure to crack open the formation’s micro-fractures and release the trapped oil and gas.
The released gas returns to the surface together with wastewater. The wastewater may be radioactive and highly saline and some of the fracking chemicals may be toxic.
If these fluids migrate to freshwater aquifers through poorly sealed wells or are not correctly treated and disposed of, they could contaminate groundwater and surface water.
Conventional gas extraction is less risky, but it too can threaten water resources if not properly managed.
As reported, ReconAfrica has acquired the rights to explore for oil and gas over an area of more than 35 000km². The Namibian Environment and Tourism ministry stated that an environmental impact assessment was done before the exploration licence was awarded. But some environmental companies and members of government in Namibia remain in the dark about this development.
Public participation is required according to both Namibian and Botswana environmental impact assessment regulations.
Fracking impacts on shared water resources
Our review of the environmental impacts of unconventional oil and gas exploration has highlighted a number of concerns. They could be relevant in this case.
Seismic surveys might disturb vegetation or damage archaeological sites such as Tsodilo Hills. Fracking wells must also be drilled and fracked during the exploration phase, to assess the economic feasibility of extraction before proceeding to full-scale production.
Of all the environmental impacts, the negative impact of fracking on water resources is the most serious concern. This is especially so in water-scarce countries such as Botswana, South Africa and Namibia.
What is more, fracking in trans-frontier parks may have trans-boundary impacts. Fracking in the headwaters of the Okavango delta within the Kavango-Zambezi trans-frontier conservation area may negatively affect the water quality in this area and also the Okavango River water in Botswana and Namibia.
Fracking in the Stampriet trans-boundary aquifer system that covers Botswana, Namibia and South Africa and where there are no permanent rivers, could have an impact on the groundwater of all three countries. Groundwater is extremely important to this region. The Stampriet trans-boundary aquifer system is the only permanent and dependable water resource for communities from central Namibia to western Botswana and South Africa’s Northern Cape province — an area that covers 87 000km².
Transboundary water resources cooperation
The impacts in these cases could cross national boundaries. So it’s essential to have transparency and co-operation between the governments that award oil and gas licences and the governments that may be affected. The Orange-Senqu River Commission promotes data sharing through the revised protocol on shared watercourses.
International water law norms and treaties also require trans-boundary management to protect shared water resources. An important draft resolution that can help countries draw up agreements is the United Nations law of trans-boundary aquifers. Other relevant treaties are the Helsinki Convention and the Kiev Protocol on Strategic Environmental Assessment.
South Africa, Namibia and Botswana are not party to these treaties and are, therefore, not bound by them. The compliance of States with international norms cannot be enforced.
So the question is whether the benefits of joint water resources management will be clear enough to all States within the basin to foster co-operation.
Stakeholder governments must agree on how to regulate oil and gas exploration and production and on what data to share, without intruding upon any State’s sovereign authority. Where such co-operation does not exist, it can lead to water disputes.
The apparent lack of transparency in sharing information about licences is a worry. Without transparency, governments cannot properly manage or monitor the trans-boundary effects of exploration and fracking activities on the shared water resources.
A baseline of the water resources in the area before extraction is required. Monitoring of water resources during and after extraction is also needed. This will allow impacts on water quantity and quality to be measured.
Worldwide, transparency regarding unconventional oil and gas extraction activities is becoming increasingly important. The country that grants the licence should use regulations to obtain the necessary disclosures.
Information that is not protected by trade secrets should also be shared on a publicly accessible website such as Fracfocus. This would make it easier for fracking companies to obtain a social licence to operate. It would ultimately ensure that shared water resources are better managed and protected.