HomeOpinion & AnalysisWhy there is perception of Zec bias

Why there is perception of Zec bias


A GROWING feature of the on-going electoral process is that those raising questions are now being cast as the problem. The legitimate issues they are raising are being trivialised and ridiculed, even when they have a bearing on the credibility of the electoral process.

By Alex Magaisa

It’s akin to a scenario in which someone complains of abuse but society and the system trivialises their complaints, even asking them what they might have done to invite the abuse. Many a time, society asks victims to just grin and bear it. The offended person might even be made to feel guilty for complaining. Apparently, the victims become the problem.

It feels a bit like that for the opposition and its supporters when it comes to their complaints over the handling of the electoral process. They are now being cast as the problem. They complain too much, or words to that effect, have been used to dismiss their complaints over the apparent irregularities. Let’s consider a few of them and try to understand why the opposition feels aggrieved.

Voters’ roll

In the Zimbabwean elections, it all started with disputes over the voters roll. The elections management body, the Zimbabwe Electoral Commission (Zec) omitted the provision of the voters roll from its initial election road-map. It raised eyebrows among the opposition and for good reason: in the last election in 2013, the electoral authority failed to provide the electronic copy of the voters roll. So any hint of non-compliance this time around was bound to cause an uproar and it did. Once bitten, twice shy, so goes an old cliché.

Zec only relented after a big push and loud outcry. But even then, the process of releasing the voters’ roll was not without problems. There was more uproar after a foreign embassy announced receipt of the voters roll before the contesting parties had got their copies. It took days for the main opposition party to finally get the voters roll, while Zanu PF and individual MPs had already received it.

It is not a coincidence that while the MDC Alliance has been complaining against Zec, the electoral authority’s main defender has been Zanu PF.

When the voters’ roll arrived, it was incomplete. Zec’s own regulations introduced after the new Biometric Voter Registration process state that the voters roll must have photographs. Zec refused to comply, selectively citing protection of privacy as a reason, notwithstanding the fact that the voters roll is by law a public document and already contains personal data. Zec wants to be seen a strict follower of the law whose conduct is guided by law, but it ignores or circumvents parts of the law when it suits it, and in the opposition’s eyes when it suits Zanu PF.

When Zec was informed by a team of analysts that there were serious anomalies in the voters’ roll which affected its integrity, it simply dismissed them, with one commissioner even disclosing that they had a different voters roll which was “near perfect”. But @TeamPachedu, a group formed by a number of professionals and experts from social media, had done the analysis of the voters roll supplied by Zec to the parties. If Zec’s explanation that it has a different voters’ roll is to be believed, did the electoral authority deliberately mislead parties when it gave them the voters’ roll?

Suffice to say Zec’s handling of the voters’ roll has left a lot to be desired. After the 2013 scandal, this was its opportunity to demonstrate a different approach.

Ballot papers

But it’s not just the voters’ roll. There is another controversy over the design and printing of the ballot paper both of which Zec has kept opaque. Some people think it’s pointless to argue over the ballot paper design and printing.

People will know who to vote for, regardless of their position on the ballot paper, they say. The position of a candidate on the ballot paper will not affect how voters make their choices, they add. They are probably correct.

Zimbabweans aren’t daft. But, actually, that is not the point of dispute.

It is that firstly, Zec has not complied with the law which requires all ballot papers to be on Form V.10. Compliance with the law is important, as Zec often says, and in this case, they have chosen to ignore it.

Second, it is not whether people’s choices can be affected by the position of a candidate on the ballot paper, but the intention behind designing the ballot paper in a manner that is inconsistent with the law. There is a reason why Zec deviated from the norm. The opposition is rightly concerned that there was a deliberate effort, on the part of Zec, to put Mnangagwa’s name in a more prominent and easily identifiable part of the clogged ballot paper which has 23 candidates.

Had Zec used the single column design as required by law, arranging candidates in alphabetical order, Mnangagwa’s name would have been in the middle of the long list. There is a legitimate fear that voters could make mistakes. Zec’s efforts to explain the design adopted for the ballot paper were weak and unconvincing. It all strengthened the perception that Zec had been influenced by bias to remove a disadvantage from Mnangagwa, which the alphabet saddled upon him.

Zec had already made it incredibly difficult to witness the printing of ballot papers in a transparent way. The opposition’s complaints about Zec’s tokenism were echoed by EU and local observers. If Zec had nothing to hide, there was nothing to lose by allowing the parties to witness the printing process and allay their fears. Instead, it adopted an opaqueness which simply cemented existing concerns.

Zec could have avoided all this by simply following the law and using Form V.10 of the electoral regulations. Its opaqueness in the design and printing of the ballot paper has simply added to the catalogue of factors suggesting that Zec is biased towards Mnangagwa.

Defending falsehoods

The third is the issue of the scarf. The Zec Chairperson appeared in a picture wearing a scarf which is associated with Mnangagwa leading opposition supporters to form an impression that there is a connection and bias. She knows it would be wrong to be seen with that scarf. After all, section 11(3)(c) of the Electoral Law prohibits a commissioner from “knowingly wear[ing) any badge or article of clothing that is or is reasonably likely to be associated with a political party or candidate contesting any election …”

This is why she denied that the picture was taken after she had been appointed Zec Chairperson. However, some people believe her statements do not add up since there is evidence suggesting that the picture was actually taken after her appointment. In the radio interview, she could not give a date, which could have easily cleared the matter. It left the impression that she wasn’t being truthful. But her wearing of the scarf is not even the most important issue.

It is that in a bid to defend her, a fellow commissioner and subordinate at Zec, Qhubani Moyo, denied the authenticity of the picture when it first appeared. Moyo dismissed it as a fake image. It turned out that he was wrong. He did not show remorse. The Zec Chairperson went on to defend him on public radio.

If Zec Commissioners can peddle falsehoods and go on to defend each other’s falsehoods, how does the electorate trust them over the electoral process? What else are they lying about? What other lies would they defend? This is why the issue matters. She can wear whatever she wants, but Zec Commissioners must be truthful and if a wrong is identified, there must be remorse, condemnation and redress.

Disparaging language

Finally, when the opposition has raised complaints on the electoral process, Zec and its commissioners have used disparaging language. The elections referee ought to stay above the fray and maintain control of the process. Descending from the balcony down to the dance-floor will only result in messy fights and Zec will end up losing sight of the bigger picture. It should not be an adversarial engagement between the elections referee and one of the parties.

For its part, opposition supporters ought to tone down the abusive language some have been using. It does not drive any point home and it only exacerbates the tensions and widens the gap from the electoral authority.


It could all have been very simple. By her own admission, the Zec Chairperson acknowledged that most people do not have trust and confidence in the institution she leads. She said regaining that trust is a process. That is correct.

The problem is that Zec has not made significant strides in its approach to build that trust and confidence. Zec could easily have opened its doors to the process of designing and printing ballot papers. It could have apologised and retracted false statements made over the scarf incident. Zec could have been more open-minded over the voters’ roll, undertaking to make changes, if any anomalies were identified.

Instead, Zec took an arrogant and dismissive approach to that issue, pre-empting any challenges to the voters roll by declaring that only a metaphor would stop an election and any anomalies would be for the courts to decide. This is not how an administrative body which has such an important national mandate behave.

 This article was first published on www.bigsr.co.uk

 Alex Magaisa is a lawyer in Zimbabwe, lecturer of law in the United Kingdom, Zimbabwean political strategist, and blogger

Recent Posts

Stories you will enjoy

Recommended reading


  1. Haiwawo Dr Magaisa you used to be non-partisan but pamaka promiswa chigaro na Nelson i dont bother read what yoou write. I still respect you though.

  2. Anybody using empirical logic can follow your reasoning Magaisa. The arrogance exhibited by ZEC officials is comgruent to that exhibited by Zanu PF officials since 1963. Which makes one wonder if they are genuinely qualified and bona fide lawyers with principles or simply happy to serve in the office albeit hypocritically.
    This country is not made up of idiots only or naive individuals who take everything they hear from officials (paid by their taxes) hook, line and sinker.
    If Zanu PF and ZEC PF do not like MDC to participate in this election, they must say so. But they must get their taxes and licenses from their rural base and stop bothering majority urbanites with taxes and licenses.

  3. Hey there, You have done a great job. I’ll certainly digg it and personally
    recommend to my friends. I’m confident they’ll be benefited from this

  4. I am not certain where you’re getting your info, however reat topic.

    I needs to spend some time studying more or figuring out more.

    Thanks for wonderful info I used to be in seawrch of this information for my mission.

  5. An outstanding share! I’ve just forwarded this onto a friend who was
    conducting a little homework on this. And he in fact bought me dinner due to the fact that I found it for him…

    lol. So allow me to reword this…. Thanks for the meal!!
    But yeah, thanx for spending some time to talk about this
    topic here on your blog.

  6. I’m gone tto convey my littⅼe brother, that hе shߋuld ɑlso pay
    а visit this weblog on regular basis to take
    updated fгom hottest news update.

  7. Tһanks ᧐n your marvelkous posting! I certainly enjoyed reading it, you migһt bе a
    great author.Ӏ will Ье sure tο bookmark yоur blog annd definiteⅼy
    wiⅼl come back latеr on. Ӏ ѡant tоo
    encourage thhat you continue yoսr great writing,
    һave a nice weekend!

  8. Hmm is anyone else experiencing problems with the images on this blog loading?
    I’m trying to determine if its a problem on my end or if it’s the
    blog. Any feed-back would be greatly appreciated.

  9. I amm reɑlly enjoying tһe theme/design of your blog. Do you ever run into аny web browser compatibility issues?
    Α small number of my blog vvisitors hɑѵe complained аbout my
    site not worқing correctly іn Explorer Ьut looқs gгeat іn Opera.

    Do you have anny tips to helр fix this proƄlem?

  10. Heya excellent blog! Does running a blog like this take a great deal of work?
    I have no expertise in programming however I
    was hoping to start my own blog soon. Anyhow, if you have any
    recommendations or tips for new blog owners please share.
    I understand this is off subject but I simply wanted to ask.

  11. Wһats սp thіѕ is kind of of offf topic Ьut I was wanting to know
    іf blogs use WYSIWYG editors or if youu hzve to mannually code ԝith HTML.
    I’m starting a blog ssoon but һave no coding knowledge ѕ᧐ I wаnted to get
    advice from someone ѡith experience. Any hеlp would bee
    enormously appreciated!

  12. Hey, I think your website might be having browser compatibility
    issues. When I look at your blog in Firefox, it looks fine but when opening in Internet Explorer, it has
    some overlapping. I just wanted to give you a quick heads up!
    Other then that, terrific blog!

  13. I do not know if it’s just me or if perhaps everybody
    else encountering issues with your blog. It looks like some of the written text within your content
    are running off the screen. Can someone else
    please provide feedback and let me know if this is happening to them
    too? This may be a issue with my internet browser because I’ve had this happen before.

  14. Hello just wanted to giѵe you a brіef heads up and let you
    know a few of the pictures arеn’t loading properlу.
    I’m not sure why but I think its а linking issue.
    I’ve tried it in two different browsers and both show tһe same outcome.

  15. Evеry weekend і ᥙsed tο pay ɑ quick visit this web pagе, for tһe reason tһat i want enjoyment, for the
    reason tһat this this web paqge conations genuinely gоod funny data

  16. Pretty element of content. I just stumbled upon your weblog and in accession capital to claim that I acquire actually loved account your blog posts. Any way I’ll be subscribing for your feeds and even I success you get entry to consistently rapidly.

Comments are closed.