Mujuru’s bravado is all hubris, join Tsvangirai alliance

9
3436
Moses Tofa

Many people have argued that National People’s Party leader (NPP) Joice Mujuru should support the MDC-T leader Morgan Tsvangirai-led coalition because the former trade unionist has the numbers compared to the former Vice-President Mujuru.

By MOSES TOFA

They also argue that Tsvangirai poses the greatest threat to Zanu PF, that he is more experienced in opposition politics, that his party has roots in the Zimbabwean society, and that the MDC-T is better organised in terms of internal functioning. These reasons have to do with comparing Mujuru and Tsvangirai and by extension, their political parties. I depart from this “comparative analysis” by focusing on why it is good for Mujuru to support a Tsvangirai-led coalition.

First, Mujuru should support a Tsvangirai-led coalition in order to build electoral trust in her credentials as an opposition cadre. Being a former Zanu PF stalwart, Mujuru came into the opposition trenches with a tainted and hated past. To make this worse, Mujuru did not leave Zanu PF on the basis of irreconcilable differences.

Instead, she was sacked on the basis of many allegations, including that she wanted to oust Zanu PF leader President Robert Mugabe. There is not a vestige of doubt that had it not been that she was sacked, she could have been in Zanu PF today. Her case is different from those people such as the late former Zanu PF secretary-general Edgar Tekere and Alliance for the People’s Agenda leader Nkosana Moyo.

Tekere was sacked because of his criticism of corruption, Mugabe’s one-party State agenda, and authoritarian politics in general. The former Industry and International Trade minister Moyo resigned under unclear circumstances, but he claims that he differed with the policy and directions, which the country was taking.

Although these claims could still be doubted, at least there is something to say about the principles of these two politicians.

Mujuru is an odd case. I watched a video in which an angry and bitter citizen narrated to Mujuru how his mother was killed by Zanu PF thugs. He proceeded to ask her the hard question that what should make him trust her as an opposition cadre when all forms of atrocities were committed by Zanu PF under her watch. Mujuru has been asked similar questions, including on programmes such as BBC’s Hard Talk.

Mujuru’s responses to these questions have been far from convincing. My advice to Mujuru is that the question of trust can never be completely answered via words, no matter how hard she may try to explain, of which she has already proved incapable of explaining. It is a question which is best answered through the credible political steps which she will take going forward.

What it means is that she needs double effort in order to dispel the perceptions that she is either a Zanu PF project or an opposition leader who is not different from Zanu PF. These perceptions cannot be dealt with completely, but it is only when they are largely dealt with that Mujuru can start to speak about building a solid profile as an opposition cadre.

When the controversy about who should lead the coalition was going on, some opposition supporters expressed concern that should Mujuru be placed at the helm of the coalition, she may play a Zanu PF card immediately before the elections and leave the opposition in a state of confusion.

Such people need not only time, but also some concrete steps from Mujuru before they begin to take her opposition credentials seriously.

I argue that one critical step for Mujuru would be to be part of a Tsvangirai-led coalition. This step can be seen as a demonstration of her commitment not only to bring about change in Zimbabwe, but also to reform herself by completely dissociating herself from a Zanu PF past.

Next, Mujuru needs to show that unlike the leaders she left in Zanu PF who believe that it is better to rule in hell than to serve in heaven, she is committed to “put Zimbabwe first”. Her forming of the opposition party after she left Zanu PF is vulnerable to the perception that she was driven by opportunism than by her alternative vision for Zimbabwe. Given her unquestionable liberation credentials and vast experience in government and politics, supporting a Tsvangirai-led coalition can be regarded as evidence that she is a humble leader who is willing to sacrifice her personal ambitions for the good of the nation.

This can also present her as someone who did “put Zimbabwe first” when she joined the liberation struggle and is “putting Zimbabwe first” again by supporting a coalition which promises to deliver Zimbabwe from the jaws and claws of evil governance. There is no doubt that by doing so, she will take a road which had not been travelled by Zanu PF psychopaths.

Third, Mujuru needs to build her capacity as an opposition cadre. To come into opposition politics directly from Zanu PF and want to present herself as the doyen of opposition is a wrong step. Her vast experience in government and politics stated above is not really essential in opposition politics.

Her NPP formation is one of the most recent parties, but it has already experienced bitter internal fights which other parties did not experience within such a short space of time. Mujuru should be aware that after her exit from Zanu PF, many of her weaknesses which were concealed became apparent.

Therefore, supporting a Tsvangirai-led coalition may communicate the message that she is a patient, pragmatic, and principled leader who is ready to acknowledge that there are people who have worked in the opposition trenches before her and that she is willing to learn and familiarise herself with the “new” terrain under the tutelage of such people.

Moses Tofa is the Founder of the Itai Dzamara Alliance. He is completing a PhD in Politics with the University of Johannesburg. Feedback: moses.tofa@itaidzamaraallaince.org.za

9 COMMENTS

  1. Solid, sensible advice which will most likely be ignored, if Tofa is correct in his analysis; hubris, as he explains. And if things stand as they are, the divided opposition will be one of the main reasons the ruining party will use to explain away their rigged victory, next year.

    Hopefully they will be more discreet in their rigging than 2013, when they claimed to be as popular (61% of votes)as they were in 1980 (63% of common role), despite leaving an economic wasteland in their trail, forcing millions into becoming economic refugees and spawning a viable, popular opposition party (MDC) in the interim.

    • Tofa raises some valid points, particularly when dealing with issues surrounding Mujuru. However, it’s one thing to encourage someone to join the MDC; and another to encourage anyone to join Tsvangirayi. Surely you will agree that Tsvangirayi and sick and if the MDC does not renew itself, then, without doubt, they will lose cheap points to Zanu or other smaller political parties. A normal thinking being cannot willingly and knowingly vote an ailing man hoping that he will resuscitate an ailing economy. That will be party politics of the worse kind, and the innocent people of Zimbabwe must be dissuaded from such ill-advised practices. Yes, people may hate Mugabe, Zanu PF and whatever they stand for. But if the MDC wants MT to be their leader and leader of this country; then maybe Zimbabwe is indeed cursed. I will reiterate, your analysis on Mujuru and why she cannot be trusted was spot on.

  2. What Tofa has given as an analysis of Mujuru is the reason why Mujuru should not join Tsvangirai. You are seeing Mujuru from an eye of an MDC supporter. Mujuru should build her own support base either from ZANU PF members not happy with what is happening in ZANU PF or from those Zimbabweans who were not supporting both ZANU PF and MDC. That is plurality. Your analysis helps MDC to keep its supporters but is not objective. As a Zimbabwean I like to be offered choices. Now I have a choice between an old man (“intelligent and shrewd), a sick middle aged man (“charismatic”) and a middle aged health woman (“brave”).

    • Why are people obsessed with Mujuru let her write her own political path. If she is irrelevant let the voters decide not some paint up job dressed as a coalition. She provides a third force or choice between Mugabe and Tsvangirayi. Both who are under attack from nature.

      • I beg to differ with u bro… 2008 someone came, formed his own party and he divided votes for ZANU PF Advantage when he decided to go it alone. Lets have one Coalition so that votes arent devided and such that we push this regime out.

  3. If you want to go fast, go alone. If you want to go far, go together. Unity starts with talking. Talking identifies strengths/weaknesses , harmonises and merges them. Fielding parallel outfits is a recipe for a grand defeat. Be warned!

  4. A good analysis from Tofa,trust by the voters is the main thing madam Mujuru must deal with before she thinks of being a brand in opposition politics hence coalition with Tsvangirai is the way forward into 2018 elections.After that then 2023 for her to be a full Flaged opposition cadre with her NPP

  5. Why form a coalition called MDCT. That’s not a coalition. Tsvangs is trying to use others to get himself into power (chitsotsi). We need a new coalition name and parties in the coalition will elect a leader of their choice. Not that Tsvangs sets conditions for others. Anopenga

  6. I used to dislike Tsvangirai too, but I now see him as the only sensible force to remove ZANU (PF) from power. No any other brand can replace his name from the electorate.

Comments are closed.