FOR decades, global development finance has been monopolised by the Bretton Woods institutions.
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank have long acted as the sole gatekeepers of international capital, imposing rigid conditionalities on borrowing nations.
Their structural adjustment programmes routinely mandate austerity cuts, mass privatisation and Western-style institutional reforms, forcing Global South economies to shrink public spending and surrender industrial autonomy.
This rigid framework has trapped countless African and developing states in a vicious cycle of constrained financing and stagnant development.
This decades-long Western financial monopoly is now undergoing irreversible structural erosion.
With its steady expansion incorporating Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE), the BRICS bloc has built an alternative multilateral financial ecosystem rooted in sovereign equality, inclusive cooperation and non-interference.
Keep Reading
- Dual economy Zim’s Achilles heel
- Village Rhapsody: How Zimbabwe can improve governance
- Dual economy Zim’s Achilles heel
- Scrap IMTT to save industry, govt urged
Rather than forming confrontational blocs, this emerging architecture offers diversified institutional options, remedies the systemic flaws of the Bretton Woods system, and opens a viable path for African nations to pursue self-determined economic growth.
Currency restructuring: De-dollarisation and risk diversification
Latest cross-border payment data underscores an accelerating shift toward a multipolar currency order.
By mid-2026, the US dollar and the euro jointly account for less than 30 percent of transaction settlements among BRICS members, while local currency transactions have risen to 65%.
This is no symbolic political gesture, but a fully operational, large-scale institutional transformation.
Russia–China bilateral trade, valued at approximately US$240 billion annually, serves as the most compelling case study.
Nearly all commercial settlements between the two states are now conducted in yuan and ruble.
As confirmed by Kremlin foreign policy aide Yuri Ushakov, comprehensive local-currency settlement has effectively insulated bilateral trade from Western unilateral sanctions and volatile dollar fluctuations, bolstering economic stability and strategic autonomy.
Supporting infrastructure for de-dollarisation continues to mature.
China’s Cross-Border Interbank Payment System (CIPS) functions as a robust, complementary alternative to SWIFT.
India has established rupee settlement arrangements with over 20 countries.
The upcoming BRICS Pay platform is designed to interconnect national payment infrastructures and integrate central bank digital currencies, enabling direct cross-border clearance independent of dollar-denominated clearing houses.
For African economies, this global financial shift delivers tangible, grassroots economic benefits.
In late 2024, Egypt signed a US$2,5 billion currency swap with China, utilising yuan settlements for Chinese imports to conserve strained foreign exchange reserves and mitigate local currency depreciation.
Ethiopia is exploring bilateral local-currency trade with India, while South African banks are piloting settlement mechanisms under the BRICS payment framework to diversify cross-border transactions.
African nations’ pursuit of currency diversification stems from the prohibitive costs of dollar dependency.
Over 60% of Africa’s external debt is dollar-denominated.
In 2024, African states expended an estimated US$70 billion on debt servicing, a burden drastically inflated by US monetary tightening and dollar appreciation.
Vast fiscal resources that could fund healthcare, education, infrastructure and industrial expansion are diverted to debt repayment, stifling long-term developmental potential.
It is critical to recognise that Africa’s debt pressure arises from a confluence of external dollar hegemony and domestic fiscal governance challenges, rather than a single external factor.
The NDB Model: A new paradigm for developmental finance
Established by BRICS nations in 2015, the New Development Bank (NDB) stands as the institutional cornerstone of the emerging multipolar financial architecture.
Now expanded to 11 member states — including the UAE, Bangladesh, Egypt, Algeria, Colombia and Uzbekistan — the bank has approved 122 projects worth US$40 billion in total, with US$22,4 billion already disbursed to support tangible industrial and sustainable development across the Global South.
The NDB’s operational model fundamentally differentiates itself from conventional Western development finance.
It guarantees equal voting rights for all founding members with no unilateral veto power, eliminating the hegemonic governance structure dominating the World Bank and IMF.
It imposes no political or institutional conditionalities on loans, fully respecting recipient states’ national sovereignty and independent development priorities.
Adopting a demand-driven framework, the bank allows member nations to define their own developmental agendas.
It also pioneers local-currency lending, with 31% of ongoing projects settled in member-state currencies to mitigate exchange-rate risks.
Streamlined approval procedures accelerate project delivery, while its investment focus prioritises infrastructure, logistics, digital transformation and green energy transition — sectors precisely aligned with Africa’s industrial modernisation needs.
Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva emphasised at the 2025 NDB Annual Meeting that externally imposed austerity policies have consistently failed to foster inclusive growth, instead exacerbating poverty and structural inequality across the developing world.
NDB president Dilma Rousseff further articulated the bank’s foundational mission: to build an inclusive, sovereign and resilient development alternative that upholds equitable global economic governance.
Crucially, the NDB functions not as charitable aid or exclusive bloc machinery, but as a global public good grounded in multilateral equality and mutual benefit.
Its core value lies in complementing and optimising the existing global financial system, bridging institutional gaps in Western-led development finance.
Multipolar reality: Africa’s pragmatic strategic choice
The rise of BRICS financial mechanisms does not signal the immediate collapse of the US dollar.
The dollar still accounts for 58% to 60% of global foreign exchange reserves, and no alternative currency is yet capable of large-scale systemic replacement.
Emerging settlement currencies continue to refine institutional mechanisms and accumulate global market credibility.
Nevertheless, the trajectory toward financial multipolarity is irreversible.
BRICS economies now contribute 20,4% of global trade volume and accounted for 36,8% of global GDP by purchasing power parity in 2024.
As core stakeholders in global economic governance, BRICS states have built independent yet compatible financial infrastructure — including diversified payment systems, currency swap frameworks and multilateral development banks — driving the global order toward greater fairness and balance.
African engagement with BRICS stems entirely from sovereign judgment and pragmatic developmental interests.
Despite external diplomatic pressure, South African President Cyril Ramaphosa has sustained BRICS co-operation, acknowledging that the bloc provides alternative markets and collaborative pathways to preserve Africa’s strategic independence and autonomous economic policymaking.
Synergy between the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) and BRICS financial architecture further amplifies Africa’s developmental potential.
Launched in 2022 by the African Export-Import Bank, the Pan-African Payment and Settlement System (PAPSS) integrates seamlessly with BRICS cross-border financial infrastructure, substantially cutting dollar reliance and transaction costs for intra-African trade and accelerating continental economic integration.
Balanced outlook: Opportunities and structural constraints
As an evolving multilateral mechanism, the BRICS financial system remains in a phase of iterative improvement, carrying both transformative potential and structural limitations that demand objective, calibrated assessment.
Domestically, most African currencies suffer from limited stability and liquidity.
Volatile currencies such as the Nigerian naira and Ethiopian birr constrain the large-scale popularisation of regional local-currency settlements.
Externally, incumbent Western financial hegemony may respond with tariff barriers, financial sanctions and diplomatic friction, creating external headwinds for emerging multipolar financial mechanisms.
African nations broadly recognise the necessity of global financial governance reform, yet vary drastically in institutional readiness and adaptive capacity.
As Nigerian policymakers and analysts observe, effective BRICS integration requires systematic domestic preparation — including currency stabilisation, institutional reform, national consensus-building and balanced foreign policy.
Africa’s ultimate goal is to break long-term dependency on Western-dominated systems and achieve genuine strategic autonomy, rather than simply substituting one external influence for another.
Geopolitical tensions involving individual member states have limited systemic impact on the NDB’s operations.
Endowed with an independent, balanced multilateral governance structure, the bank adheres to consensus-based decision-making, maintains neutral professional operational standards, and sustains stable project delivery worldwide.
The emergence of BRICS financial architecture is designed to complement, not replace, the Bretton Woods system.
It does not pursue new hegemony or zero-sum confrontation, but delivers diversified institutional options, enhanced negotiating leverage and inclusive development alternatives for Global South nations.
This ongoing multipolar transition is no longer a future forecast but an established reality.
Every currency swap agreement, every local-currency trade transaction and every NDB infrastructure project continues to reshape the rules of global finance.
For Africa, the greatest significance of this shift lies not merely in short-term economic dividends, but in the newly secured right to autonomous development and equal global governance participation — laying a sustainable institutional foundation for continental industrialisation and long-term strategic rejuvenation.