WHEN an airline opens a route it has never flown before, it is not making a statement about the past. It is making a bet on the future.
It has modelled the load factors, priced the fuel burn, assessed the repatriation risk on its revenue and concluded that the numbers work.
When Etihad Airways announced in April 2026 that it will launch three weekly flights between Abu Dhabi and Harare from March 2027, the airline was not restoring something that existed before. Etihad has never served Harare.
This was a brand new commercial judgement on a market that spent two decades watching other carriers walk away.
That is a different kind of signal and a stronger one.
In 1999, thirty-four different airlines flew to Zimbabwe.
Keep Reading
- Nkayi gets new CEO
- Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan becomes UAE president
- Trafficking victims to return home soon: Minister
- UAE’s Masdar forms joint venture for Renewable Deployment in Africa
Then the land seizures began, the currency collapsed, hyperinflation set in and the country’s commercial relationship with the outside world fractured.
The European carriers left first. British Airways, which had been operating three non-stop services a week from London Heathrow to Harare, suspended the route on October 28, 2007, citing losses so severe it could no longer sustain the service.
Before BA’s departure, Swissair, Lufthansa, KLM and Air France had gone.
Qantas, which had operated a same-plane service connecting Harare to Australia and Asia, pulled out in the late 1990s.
Austria, Air India, Egypt Air, Mauritius, Air Namibia and a dozen more regional carriers followed.
By 2007 to 2009, at the height of the economic crisis, Zimbabwe’s Civil Aviation Authority counted only eight airlines still operating routes into the country.
From thirty-four to eight. More than half the network, gone.
Airlines read the political economy the way actuaries read mortality tables.
What they saw in Zimbabwe after 2000 was not merely an economic crisis, but a specific class of risk: a government that could not guarantee that the hard currency an airline earned on ticket sales could be freely repatriated.
When you cannot get your money out, the route is not commercially viable regardless of passenger numbers.
Lufthansa did not leave because Zimbabweans stopped wanting to fly to Frankfurt.
British Airways did not abandon Heathrow to Harare because the demand disappeared.
They left because the legal and financial architecture required to operate a profitable international route had broken down.
The Mail and Guardian quoted British Airways directly when the route was cut: the Harare route had been making a considerable loss and the airline could no longer sustain it.
Recovery, when it came, was gradual and deliberately unspectacular.
After dollarisation in 2009 removed the immediate hyperinflation crisis, regional carriers began rebuilding frequencies.
Kenya Airways, Ethiopian Airlines and South African Airways increased their services. Emirates launched daily Harare flights.
By the mid-2010s, the Civil Aviation Authority of Zimbabwe had rebuilt the network to 15 airlines.
It was not the 34 of 1999, but it was movement.
Then came the infrastructure.
In July 2023, after nearly five years of construction, President Emmerson Mnangagwa opened a new international terminal at Robert Gabriel Mugabe International Airport, funded by a US$153 million concessional loan from the Export-Import Bank of China.
The expansion more than doubled the airport’s annual passenger handling capacity, from 2,5 million to six million.
New aprons, four aerobridges, a modern terminal building and upgraded airfield lighting and communications systems.
The airport that airlines had quietly left in the early 2000s was no longer the same airport.
The runway at 4 725 metres can handle the Boeing 777 and 747.
For an airline assessing whether a route is operationally viable, this matters.
The passenger data confirms that demand has followed the infrastructure.
In the first quarter of 2024, air travellers into Zimbabwe surged by 171,6%, from 49 369 in the same period of 2023 to 134 107.
Robert Gabriel Mugabe International Airport alone handled 96 658 of those arrivals.
Business-related visits grew by 204,7% in the same period.
Full-year 2024 international arrivals reached 1 613 901, with tourism receipts of approximately US$1,2 billion.
But the most telling number in Zimbabwe’s aviation story is not a passenger count. It is a remittance figure.
In 2024, Zimbabweans living abroad sent US$2,58 billion back to Zimbabwe, a 195% increase on the US$922 million recorded in 2019.
The United Kingdom overtook South Africa as the single largest source of those remittances, contributing US$709,6 million.
Between four and seven million Zimbabweans live abroad.
These are people who travel home.
They have family to visit, funerals to attend, properties to maintain and businesses to check on. In airline revenue management terms, they are high-frequency, motivated travellers with predictable demand.
There is no direct flight between London and Harare.
There has not been one since British Airways cut the route in 2007.
The diaspora in the UK, which now sends home more money than any other country in the world, is forced to connect through Addis Ababa, Dubai, Johannesburg, Nairobi or Kigali to reach home.
An 11-hour direct journey becomes an 18-hour ordeal.
This is a gap measured in hundreds of millions of dollars of annual spending on indirect routings.
Etihad’s Abu Dhabi hub is not a direct fix, but a more convenient one-stop connection than most currently available and it positions the airline squarely in the path of that demand.
Etihad’s chief executive was explicit about the commercial logic.
The airline described demand for air connectivity across key African markets as outpacing existing supply, particularly in cargo and trade-linked sectors.
This is not a leisure play. The airline is positioning Harare alongside Lagos, Accra and Kinshasa as a trade and cargo destination, not merely a safari gateway.
The alignment with Etihad’s China network adds another layer: Abu Dhabi as the bridge between African resource markets and Chinese manufacturing demand.
Zimbabwe’s lithium, platinum and gold are part of that logic, whether stated explicitly or not.
The question worth asking is what, precisely, has changed. The formal economy remains fragile.
The currency has been replaced and devalued more times than most Zimbabweans can easily count.
The informal sector now accounts for roughly 64% of total economic activity.
None of that is the profile of a straightforwardly attractive airline market.
What has changed is the size of the diaspora, the volume of money it moves, the modernisation of the airport infrastructure and the demonstrated willingness of the government to invest in the physical conditions that airlines require.
Qatar Airways is there. Emirates is there. Ethiopian Airlines operates daily.
The network has rebuilt to a point where an entrant can justify joining it.
The history of Zimbabwe’s aviation market is a compressed lesson in how commercial confidence works.
Thirty-four airlines flew into the country when the economy was functioning and eight remained when it collapsed.
The recovery to 15, and then beyond, tracked the slow reconstruction of the conditions that make commercial aviation viable: currency convertibility, predictable regulation, physical infrastructure and sufficient demand.
That Etihad looked at all of this for the first time and decided the numbers work is a data point in that reconstruction, not a proclamation that the work is finished.
British Airways has not returned. KLM has not returned.
The direct London to Harare route, which once served a diaspora that now sends home more than seven hundred million dollars a year from the UK alone, remains unfulfilled.
That gap is also a signal. An airline that flies a route is telling you it has done the numbers and they work.
An airline that does not fly a route is telling you something different.
Etihad opening Harare for the first time from March 2027 is progress, and it is worth recognising as such.
The full restoration of Zimbabwe’s international aviation network will not be marked by a Press release.
It will be marked by the moment a major European carrier decides that the numbers finally work again.
Until then, the timetable tells the truth about where things actually stand.