As Highlanders celebrate their centenary, the script should be one of unity and renewal.
A 100-year milestone for an institution of Bosso’s stature ought to unite generations, honour history and inspire a new era.
Instead, the landmark is unfolding under a dark cloud of infighting, litigation and administrative instability that threatens to overshadow the club’s legacy.
At the centre of the turmoil is a governance crisis which could spill into the courts.
Executive committee member development Kindman Ndlovu and secretary Morgen Dube have reportedly taken legal action against treasurer Nkani Khoza over yet to be established details.
Khoza is said to have been served with summons from the two executives’ lawyers.
Ndlovu confirmed but would not divulge the issue, saying it was advice from his legal practitioners.
That senior officials are suing each other is a damning indictment of internal collapse.
- Big send-off for Cont Mhlanga
- Inside sport: The right way to do it
- Highlanders’ away woes continue
- Inside sport: Let’s fight Zim football’s hooliganism menace
Keep Reading
Football clubs are designed to resolve disputes within their own statutes.
Taking each other to court not only exposes the club to sanctions, but signals a breakdown of trust at the highest level.
But this is only one piece of a much larger puzzle.
Highlanders’ instability is perhaps best captured by the turbulence in the chief executive’s office—a position that has become a revolving door over the years.
Nhlanhla Dube took over from the late Ndumiso Gumede, substantively becoming chief executive officer in 2017, providing a measure of continuity at the time.
He was succeeded by Ronald Moyo in 2022 and later Brian Moyo, whose tenure ended in disgrace after suspension and a subsequent fraud conviction.
In the aftermath, Ndlovu briefly acted as CEO, but even that stint was cut short after he resigned following differences with treasurer Nkani Khoza—yet another flashpoint in the club’s internal conflicts.
However he was persuaded to reverse his resignation.
The latest occupant, Denzil Mnkandla, has also been suspended, continuing a cycle that has left the club without stable administrative leadership.
Such turnover is not just disruptive—it is crippling.
A club cannot build vision, enforce accountability or implement strategy when its leadership is constantly changing.
Each new administration inherits unresolved tensions, while new disputes emerge before old ones are resolved.
Even the technical bench has not been spared from the courtroom.
Former assistant coach Agent Sawu has been involved in litigation with the club, as has former coach Pieter de Jongh, whose narrative was rather dismissed by the club.
Another lawsuit is from former welfare manager Vezigama Dlodlo, who is seeking thousands of dollars from the club, to compensate him for injuries sustained in a traffic accident while on duty.
Dlodlo claims he has used personal funds to seek treatment.
But the scenario has further highlighted a pattern where disagreements at Highlanders increasingly end in legal confrontation rather than internal resolution.
This growing culture of litigation is a warning sign of institutional decay.
Amid all this, the club’s relationships with sponsors and benefactors adds another layer of complexity.
Businessman Wicknell Chivayo, has been a crucial lifeline, bringing much-needed financial support to the club.
It is his backing that facilitated the arrival of coach Benjani Mwaruwari but after Bosso dumped South African Thabo Senong, who had already put pen to paper with the club.
Sources say Senong was compensated for the glitch, another potentiallly looming legal battle (that was on the cards) for the Bulawayo giants.
On paper, such investment by Chivayo, who has poured millions of dollars to the club and pays Mwaruwari, should have stabilised the club and strengthened its competitive edge.
But financial backing alone cannot fix structural dysfunction.
Mwaruwari’s recent public outburst laid bare the frustrations within the technical team—frustrations rooted in administrative inefficiencies and internal resistance.
When a coach questions whether he has full support, it reflects a deeper disconnect between the boardroom and the bench.
On the pitch, the consequences are evident.
Six consecutive draws at the start of the season tell a story of a team that is competitive but lacks the cutting edge.
It mirrors the institution itself—full of potential, yet unable to translate it into decisive outcomes.
There is a direct link between instability upstairs and inconsistency on the field.
For a club that last won the league title in 2006, the centenary should have been a rallying point—a moment to reset and reclaim its place at the summit of Zimbabwean football.
Instead, it risks becoming a symbol of how quickly a giant can lose its way.
Highlanders have always stood for more than football.
They are a community institution, built on identity, pride and unity.
But today, that identity is being eroded by internal divisions, personal battles and a governance framework that appears increasingly fragile.
The badge is no longer the focal point—individual interests are.
There is still time to change course.
But it requires leadership that rises above factionalism, embraces accountability and puts the club first.
Otherwise, Bosso’s centenary will not be remembered as a celebration of 100 years of greatness.
It will be remembered as the moment the institution was consumed from within.
