The uproar over the outcome of the Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 (CAB3) process raises an uncomfortable question: where were the critics when their participation mattered most?
Democracy is not a spectator sport. It demands engagement, action and responsibility. Yet many of those now expressing outrage appear not to have written objection letters, signed petitions, submitted responses or even communicated their concerns to Parliament during the consultation process.
Those who supported the process did not sit back and complain. They organised, mobilised and ensured their views were formally recorded. Some may call it mobilisation. Others may call it influence. Some may even dismiss it as manipulation. Regardless of the label, one fact remains: they produced documented evidence that more than 500,000 responses supported their position.
Their opponents, meanwhile, largely occupied the sidelines.
In any democratic system, decision-makers rely on evidence placed before them through official channels. Social media outrage after the fact carries far less weight than submissions made during the consultation period. Complaints posted online cannot substitute for participation in the processes designed to shape public policy.
Citizens who choose silence during consultation should not be shocked when decisions are made without reflecting their views.
Keep Reading
- Zim headed for a political dead heat in 2023
- Cars up for grabs in batteries competition
- Africa should be better prepared for Europe’s security funding shift
- Sadc PF wants right to health enforceable
The CAB3 debate offers an important lesson for future national conversations. Democratic participation extends far beyond casting a ballot on election day. It includes responding to public consultations, engaging Parliament, signing petitions, attending meetings and making one’s position known through recognised channels.
Influence belongs to those who show up.
The reality is straightforward: those who participated helped shape the outcome; those who did not surrendered that opportunity. Democracy rewards engagement, not hindsight.
The next time an issue of national importance arises, citizens must resist the temptation to wait until the process is over before finding their voice. They must speak when it counts, participate when invited and engage while decisions are still being made.
In politics, as in life, the scoreboard rarely favours those who stayed in the dressing room.