PRESIDENT Emmerson Mnangagwa last week warned against sabotage and corruption targeting major investments. 

Commissioning the new 10-megawatt Glovers Solar Power Plant in Kwekwe, Mnangagwa said his government would show “zero tolerance” towards vandalism, theft and corruption threatening strategic infrastructure projects critical to Zimbabwe’s economic recovery. 

He said anyone who stoles cables, vandalised infrastructure or demanded bribes from investors was an enemy of development. 

Zimbabwe, however, does not suffer from a shortage of warnings. It suffers from a shortage of consequences. 

For years, senior officials have thundered against corruption, sabotage and abuse of office. Yet corruption has continued to spread through institutions that are supposed to protect the public interest and safeguard economic growth. 

Prospective investors routinely express interest in Zimbabwe, only for their enthusiasm to evaporate after encounters with endless bureaucracy, rent-seeking and demands for “facilitation fees”. 

Keep Reading

Bribery inflates the cost of doing business, undermines confidence and discourages long-term investment. Serious capital does not thrive where rules are negotiable and access depends on who has been paid. 

At the same time, some investors have been allowed to pollute rivers, destroy mountains and degrade communities in the reckless pursuit of minerals — often under the protection of corrupt networks embedded within the system itself. 

Others continue operating in sectors legally reserved for locals after greasing the palms of bureaucrats willing to sacrifice national policy for personal enrichment. 

This is why repeated warnings, however strongly worded, are steadily losing force. They are not changing behaviour because the risk of being caught and punished remains too low, too slow and too inconsistent. 

A culture of impunity cannot be shouted down. It must be dismantled. 

The damage caused by corruption is not measured only in stolen money. It is also measured in stolen confidence. Every bribe demanded at a border post, every permit deliberately delayed for personal gain and every suspicious tender awarded behind closed doors sends the same message to citizens and investors alike: the system can be manipulated by those with money and influence. 

If the government is serious about economic recovery, it must stop treating corruption a mere moral failing and start treating it as a national economic emergency. 

That requires more than speeches. It requires structural rupture. 

Officials who demand bribes must not be quietly transferred — they must be prosecuted. Agencies that deliberately delay services to extract payment must be audited, exposed and reformed. Procurement systems must be transparent enough to prevent manipulation, not merely condemn it after the damage has already been done. 

Most importantly, enforcement must be consistent. Selective justice is not justice at all. It merely transforms anti-corruption into another instrument of political convenience. 

Mr President, the era of warnings must now give way to the era of action. 

The starting point should be targeting those who facilitated invasion into sectors reserved for locals, those who approved environmentally destructive mining activities and those who turned public offices into tollgates for personal enrichment. 

There is also a harder truth that cannot be ignored: corruption survives where it is tolerated at the top — whether actively or passively. If junior officials are punished while powerful networks remain untouched, the system will simply reproduce itself. 

Zimbabwe does not need another policy statement about integrity. It needs a visible shift in power — away from those who profit from dysfunction, towards institutions capable of enforcing accountability without fear or favour. 

Until that happens, every warning against corruption will sound less like serious admonition to the corrupt and more like a broken record playing to a weary nation.