THE global economy is experiencing massive growth in debt exacerbated by the Covid-19 pandemic, which had forced countries to borrow to boost their reserves and bring some form of economic resilience. The borrowed funds were also used to finance stimulus packages to support struggling businesses and at-risk groups.
The Covid-19 pandemic has fuelled debt expansion as countries struggled to service their debts. As of the end of 2021, total global external debt registered a nominal increase of 5,6% to US$9 trillion.
According to the latest World Bank 2022 International Debt Report, 60% of the countries eligible for the Debt Service Suspension Initiative are assessed at high risk of debt distress or are already in debt distress.
The escalation of geopolitical tensions from the Russia-Ukraine war, which is leading to tighter global financial conditions, higher global inflation, lower growth, and higher stress on public finances is exerting massive adverse implications for low and middle-income countries’ debt dynamics.
Here at home, domestic resource mobilisation has remained a perennial challenge owing to bad economic policies, climate change, Covid-19, burgeoning debt as well as structural rigidities such as corruption and illicit financial flows.
These challenges have continued to bedevil the government’s efforts to mobilise resources pushing it to over-rely on collateralised borrowing, which is often-times not publicly disclosed. Now, the nation is trapped in debt distress as it is failing to fully service its debts leading to the accumulation of arrears and penalties.
The prevailing unsustainable debt level is exerting dire developmental impacts on the economy and citizens. Despite these impacts, the latest 2023 Zimbabwe Public Debt Statement shows a ballooning borrowing appetite by the government.
The statistics show that total Public and Publicly Guaranteed (PPG) debt (external and domestic) including Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe (RBZ) debt stands at approximately ZW$10,97 trillion (US$17,6 billion), as of the end of September 2022, up from ZW$1,9 trillion (US$17,2 billion) recorded as of December 2021.
- Young entrepreneur dreams big
- Chibuku NeShamwari holds onto ethos of culture
- Health talk: Be wary of measles, its a deadly disease
- Macheso, Dhewa inspired me: Chinembiri
Of the total, external PPG debt accounts for 79,6% (US$14 billion), including Blocked Funds at 13,2% (US$2,3 billion) while domestic debt constitutes 20% (US$3,6 billion).
The astronomical spike of public debt by 477% in ZWL terms between December 2021 and September 2022 mainly represents a deterioration of the local currency against the United States dollar, which depreciated from ZW$108:US$1 at the end December 2021, to ZW$622:US$1 as at end September 2022.
However, in USD terms, the total PPG debt registered a marginal increase of about 2,3% between December 2021 and September 2022, owing to new disbursements for ongoing projects and RBZ borrowing, as well as the continuous accumulation of penalties.
A granular analysis indicates that total PPG debt as of September 2022 represents 104% of the 2022 GDP, which is projected at ZW$10,55 trillion.
This debt-to-GDP ratio has breached the 70% threshold which is set out in the Public Debt Management Act as well as the 60% threshold agreed upon by member countries under the Southern African Development Community’s (Sadc) macroeconomic convergence targets.
Regionally, the 2022 World Bank report shows that the external debt stock of low and middle-income nations in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) has increased to US$790 billion in 2021. This is a 5,1% and 145,3% jump from US$752 billion and US$322 billion recorded in the decade ending 2020 and 2010 respectively.
Consequently, the SSA region’s reserves-to-external debt plunged to 15% in 2021 from 19% in 2020 and 48% in 2010. The figure below compares three key debt ratios between major Sadc economies.
The continued growth of Zimbabwe’s debt is worrisome as it is now tied with
Mozambique as a Sadc member with the lowest Reserves-to-External Debt ratio in the region.
The duo had a Reserve-to-External Debt ratio of 6%, which is lower when compared to other highly indebted countries in the region: Zambia (11%), Mauritius (56%), Angola (22%), and Lesotho (43%). This ratio shows how many dollars a country has in reserves for every dollar of debt owed to its external creditors.
It also indicates how much money the government is setting aside for future use and its flexibility to react to adverse or unforeseen contingencies.
It is worrisome to note that reserves are falling at a time the globe is experiencing a seismic shift in climatic conditions as droughts, floods and cyclones are becoming more frequent and having a huge toll on the Global South.
Again, Zimbabwe has a low External Debt Service-to-Exports ratio alternatively known as the debt service ratio. This is a ratio of debt service payments made by or due from a country to that country’s export earnings.
As such, it measures the severity of a country’s debt burden. The latest World Bank data shows that out of the 12 Sadc nations as covered in the figure above, Zimbabwe is only one notch below the semi-interquartile range arranged in descending order that is starting with countries with the highest debt service ratios.
Therefore, it means that Zimbabwe is among the Sadc nations spending more of their export earnings servicing external debt.
Nevertheless, in terms of transparency of budget processes, as measured by the International Budget Partnership’s (IBP) Global Open Budget Survey (OBS), Zimbabwe has moved 11 points up from 52 to settle at 41 out of 120 countries surveyed globally in 2021.
Within the African continent, Zimbabwe is ranked third after South Africa and Benin. This means that the nation is faring well in ensuring public access to budget information, allowing the participation of citizens in national budget formulation and implementation, and respecting the role of budget oversight and accountability institutions.
While there is still a lot to be desired in Zimbabwe’s budget processes, the upward trajectory of its global ranking by IBP since 2019 is a welcome development.
But, be that as it may, it is worrisome to note that public debt is set to jump significantly in 2023 as Treasury faces a mammoth task of financing a ZW$575,5 billion budget gap comprising an overall deficit of ZW$336,9 billion and net loan repayments of ZW$248,6 billion.
The Treasury proposed to finance this deficit by issuing a domestic bond to the tune of US$100 million, issuing ZWL82.8 billion treasury bills (TBs), and a US$400 million external loan facility expected from Afreximbank.
Ahead of the 2023 harmonised elections, the Treasury will also gobble tens of millions of USD as loans to lawmakers and cabinet ministers together with their deputies.
Likely, these loans were not budgeted for and hence pose severe debt ramifications. The dire impacts of a ballooning and unsustainable debt include inter alia crowding out of both private sector investment and public service delivery, over-reliance on resource-backed loans (RBLs), elevated long-term interest, tax, and inflation rates, and depletion of national reserves.
Currently, public debt is shrouded in secrecy as the public is unaware of the terms and conditions of some loans being accrued by their government.
Consequent to this, total PPG debt has reached unsustainable levels and is showing no signs of slowing down.
The situation is affecting the capacity of the state to discharge its developmental responsibilities and the realisation of human rights including social, economic, and cultural rights.
Also, the ripple effects of the prevailing unsustainable debt are the continued suffering of marginalised women and youths who are more often than not suffering in the quagmire of unemployment, fragile ZWL, and hyperinflation.
As such, to put Zimbabwe's economy and its citizens on the right footing, authorities should resolve the debt conundrum as soon as yesterday.
- Gwenzi is a financial analyst and MD of Equity Axis, a financial media firm offering business intelligence, economic and equity research. — email@example.com