The upcoming public consultations on the Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment Number 3 Bill, scheduled to run from March 30 to April 2, represent a pivotal moment for the country’s democratic health.
However, as reports emerge from civil society, it is becoming increasingly clear that the path toward a credible constitutional review is being obstructed by a pervasive "atmosphere of fear" and systemic inequity.
For any constitutional amendment to hold legitimacy, the process must be more than a mere box-ticking exercise; it must be a genuine reflection of the people's will.
Currently, the operating environment is decidedly restrictive. While the ruling party, Zanu PF, appears to enjoy unfettered freedom to campaign and "coach" its supporters, civil society organisations and opposition parties find themselves hindered by a climate of tension.
This disparity is further exacerbated by a critical “information gap”, where simplified and accessible details about the bill remain out of reach for the average citizen.
When information is one-sided, the resulting contributions during public discussions cannot be considered informed or representative.
Furthermore, the logistical arrangements for these hearings raise serious questions about inclusivity.
By selecting remote venues far from community hubs and business centres, the authorities have effectively created a barrier to participation for those without the means to travel long distances.
There are already deeply concerning reports that the ruling party intends to strategically transport its own supporters to these distant locations, a move that threatens to skew the entire consultative process.
The authorities must understand that a constitution is a sacred social contract, not a partisan instrument to be altered through “ambush” tactics or manufactured sentiment.
We call upon the government to ensure that these consultations are transparent, inclusive, and grounded in genuine engagement.
Crucially, the security establishment must take immediate steps to guarantee the safety of every Zimbabwean who wishes to speak out.
No citizen should face the threat of reprisal or intimidation for exercising their democratic right to voice an opinion.
The eyes of the international community are on Zimbabwe.
To proceed with a flawed, one-sided consultation is to risk a constitutional outcome that lacks both moral and legal authority.
It is time for the state to prioritise the voices of all its people over narrow political interest.
President Emmerson Mnangagwa must not forget what he promised Zimbabweans when he rose to power after the 2017 military coup.
Mnangagwa said “the voice of the people is the voice of God”. We expect him to demonstrate that he meant what he said with the upcoming hearings.