For nearly three decades, the Muckraker column has refused to behave. In a media landscape often shaped by caution, compromise and, at times, silence, this column chose a different path — irreverent, unflinching and unapologetically intrusive.
Week after week, it has poked at power, mocked excess, and dismantled the carefully-constructed narratives of those who would rather not be questioned.
Published since the Zimbabwe Independent’s early years, Muckraker has become one of the longest-running and most recognisable columns in Zimbabwean journalism. It has built a following that cuts across political divides, not because it seeks consensus, but because it refuses to spare anyone.
No office has been too high, and no claim has been too sacred, while no contradiction has been too small.
Its method has been simple: observe closely, remember everything, and say what others are thinking, often with a sting.
But that defiance has not come without consequence.
Keep Reading
- MUCKRAKER: Crooks are having a field day while Chris keeps blabbering
- Zimind editor scoops global award
- In honour of Abigail Gamanya
- Minister calls for new media investors
Over the years, the column has drawn anger, threats and sustained pressure. More recently, it crossed into even more dangerous territory, leading to the arrest of our editor, Faith Zaba, last year. For us, it was a reminder that satire, in environments intolerant of scrutiny, is rarely treated as harmless.
Yet Muckraker has endured.
It has survived political transitions, economic upheavals, and shifting media tides. It has outlived critics who dismissed it as reckless, and discomforted those who preferred a quieter press. Through it all, it has retained its edge — adapting, but never retreating.
As we celebrate out 30th anniversary next month, this page revisits some of the most memorable columns from that long, unruly run. They are sharp, sometimes uncomfortable and often inconvenient. They were meant to be, because at its core, Muckraker is not just a column but a test of how much truth a society is willing to tolerate when it is delivered without deference.
As you read these pieces again, what becomes clear is the targets may change but the instinct to challenge and provoke remains intact.
And in that refusal lies its power. For this week, however, what comes below is not the Muckraker, but one of our earliest comments published on May 10, 1996: