Zimbabweans have spent the past few days debating veteran musician Thomas Mapfumo’s decision to accept a reported US$1 million offer to perform at two private events.
The Chimurenga music legend announced that he would perform at musician Jah Prayzah’s wedding and businessman Wicknell Chivayo’s birthday celebrations.
The announcement immediately generated considerable debate on social media.
For decades, Mapfumo has been known not only for his music, but also for his strong views on governance, corruption and other national issues.
His music has historically carried powerful political and social messages, while his public commentary has often placed him at the centre of national debate.
Some Zimbabweans therefore expected him to reject the offer because of the public controversies associated with Chivayo and his perceived proximity to the government.
Keep Reading
- Mukanya to headline tribute concert in SA
- Out & about: S1mba’s music newsier than expected
- Mukanya in flight dilemma
- Mukanya to headline tribute concert in SA
Mapfumo chose otherwise, maintaining that the money was payment for a performance and that he was coming to work.
From a business perspective, the controversy raises an interesting question: Does accepting payment from a customer necessarily amount to endorsing that customer’s political views, reputation or associations? The answer is not always straightforward.
Businesses and professionals regularly provide services to people with whom they may disagree on political, religious or social matters. A hotel does not ordinarily adopt the political views of every guest who books a room, nor does a transport company become associated with every passenger it carries.
Similarly, lawyers, accountants and consultants may provide lawful services to clients whose personal views differ from their own. A commercial transaction is, therefore, not necessarily an ideological partnership.
This appears to be the distinction Mapfumo is making. He is a musician and performing is his profession. His music may carry powerful political and social messages, but it also remains a commercial product from which he earns a living.
There is an important lesson here for entrepreneurs. Business owners must distinguish between a gift, an investment, a partnership and payment for services rendered because each transaction creates different expectations and carries different implications.
A gift may raise questions about motive and obligation. An investment may give another person an economic interest in a business, while a partnership creates a closer commercial relationship.
Payment for a service, however, is ordinarily an exchange of value: the customer pays and the service provider performs.
That distinction matters in business. The person asking you to reject a million-dollar contract on principle is not always prepared to finance the cost of your principle.
This is not an argument that money should override integrity. Reputation remains one of the most valuable assets possessed by any business or professional, and there are transactions which businesses may reasonably decline because the potential damage to their brands outweighs the financial benefit.
Every entrepreneur must assess the reputational risk associated with major commercial decisions. Such an assessment should consider the nature of the transaction, its legality, the potential impact on the brand and the long-term interests of the business.
However, reputational risk must be assessed rationally; it cannot simply be outsourced to the loudest voices on social media.
The Mapfumo debate also presents an important lesson about brand value. The reported US$1 million arrangement is remarkable because Mapfumo is not a new musician attempting to establish himself in the market. He has built his name over several decades.
The value attached to his performances is not determined merely by the number of hours he may spend on stage. It reflects decades of music, international performances, cultural influence and the development of the Chimurenga music brand.
In business, this is known as brand equity. A strong brand can command a premium because customers are not merely purchasing a product or service; they are also purchasing reputation, history, experience and scarcity.
In this case, the customer is not simply paying for a musician to stand on stage and sing. The customer is purchasing the experience and prestige associated with having Thomas Mapfumo perform at a private event. That distinction affects price.
An experienced lawyer may spend a relatively short period preparing an opinion, but the client is also paying for years of accumulated knowledge and experience. A skilled engineer may identify a problem within minutes because of expertise acquired over decades.
Similarly, an established musician may perform for only a few hours, but the commercial value of that performance may have taken a lifetime to build. Sometimes people pay you for an hour, but the price of that hour is determined by the decades it took you to become valuable.
Zimbabwean entrepreneurs should pay attention to this distinction. Many businesses continue to compete primarily on price, attempting to become the cheapest supplier rather than building brands capable of commanding premium prices.
Sustainable businesses invest in reputation, consistency, customer experience and quality. Over time, these intangible assets may become more valuable than the physical assets owned by an enterprise.
Entrepreneurs must therefore ask themselves an important question: Are you building a business that merely sells a product, or are you building a name that will one day command a premium?
Mapfumo’s reported fee provides an interesting case study. The value placed on the performance is ultimately a commercial matter between the parties to the transaction. The wider business lesson is that decades of building a recognisable brand can create significant economic value.
The controversy also demonstrates the growing influence of social media on commercial decisions. Public opinion can affect brands and businesses cannot afford to ignore consumer sentiment completely. However, social media commentary should not automatically become a substitute for sound business judgement.
Social media can advise a business, but it cannot be allowed to become its board of directors.
Entrepreneurs must distinguish between genuine reputational risk and temporary online controversy. The loudest voices on social media do not always represent the entire market and, more importantly, people commenting on a commercial transaction are not necessarily the people purchasing the service.
Business decisions require an assessment of contracts, financial benefits, legal risks, brand implications and long-term strategy. Emotion and public pressure alone are rarely sufficient foundations for commercial decision-making.
There is also a broader lesson for Zimbabwe’s creative industry. Artists must increasingly understand themselves as businesses. Music is intellectual property, a performance is a service and a musician’s name is a brand.
For many years, African societies have celebrated talented artists while paying insufficient attention to the commercial value of their work. The result has often been artists who achieve enormous cultural influence but struggle financially later in life.
Building sustainable careers in the creative sector requires artists to understand pricing, contracts, intellectual property, investment and brand management. Artistic talent may create fame, but commercial discipline is often what converts that fame into sustainable economic value.
Mapfumo’s reported performance fee may generate political and social debate, but it also demonstrates the potential commercial value of a brand developed over many years. Whether one agrees with his decision or not, entrepreneurs should understand the central lesson: know what you are selling and understand the value of the name behind it.
The debate surrounding Mapfumo’s decision will undoubtedly continue. For businesspeople, however, there is another conversation worth having: sometimes a customer is simply buying a service, and sometimes the value of a few hours of work is determined by the decades spent building the name behind it.
*Dr Believe Guta is an entrepreneur, author, public intellectual and investment strategist. He writes in his personal capacity.