Zimbabwe publishes GDP growth figures, consumer price indices, manufacturing surveys, and quarterly labour force reports. Its statistics agency, ZimStat, produces data that competes with any in the region for frequency and coverage. None of these metrics, useful as they are, captures what a ten-minute drive through Harare, Bulawayo, or Mutare communicates instantly: the sheer number of people selling things on the side of the road. That number has not gone down in a generation. It has gone up, and what it tells us about the structure of the Zimbabwean economy is more direct and less contestable than most of what appears in official publications.
This is not an argument against economic data. It is an argument for reading that data alongside the most visible output of Zimbabwe’s labour market: the roadside vendor. The density of pavement trade, the variety of goods on display, and the origin of those goods together form a composite picture of who the Zimbabwean economy is serving, who it is failing, and what it has stopped producing for itself.
Zimbabwe’s first national economic census, the results of which ZimStat released in July 2025, found that 76,1% of businesses in the country operate outside the formal system. The Bloomberg report on those findings noted that the informal sector accounts for more than three-quarters of all economic activity. The Danish Institute for International Studies, drawing on a 2024 survey of 2 490 informal operators in Harare and Masvingo, found that the informal sector contributes close to two-thirds of national economic output and accounts for four-fifths of employment. By Q3 2024, the ZimStat Quarterly Labour Force Survey put informal non-agricultural employment at 43,6% of the total employed population.
These are not numbers that describe a shadow economy operating at the margins of a functioning formal system. They describe an economy in which informality is the dominant mode of participation. Within that informal economy, vendors constitute a specific and highly visible subset. The UNDP Accelerator Lab in Zimbabwe, which mapped informal market activities across the country, described vending as frequently the only source of livelihood available to the most economically vulnerable urban populations. The ZimStat survey found that 48% of all informally employed persons work in the wholesale and retail trade, a category that includes but substantially consists of street and bus-stop commerce.
The Zimbabwe Congress of Trade Unions estimates that formal-sector employment has contracted from roughly 1,5 million workers two decades ago to approximately 700 000 today, with much of even that reduced figure now on fixed-term contracts that offer limited protection. In Q1 2024, formally employed persons constituted just 30% of the total workforce. The gap between those figures, the workers the formal economy has shed over twenty years, did not disappear. They are selling tomatoes, airtime, phone cases, and boiled eggs at bus stops.
The roadside vending cluster, what might reasonably be called the bus-stop macroeconomic ecosystem, is a catchment point defined by human movement. It forms wherever commuters disembark, wherever traffic slows, wherever pedestrian density creates a captive market. These are not random. They follow the transport network, concentrate around industrial areas that have lost their workers, and thicken at the edges of formal retail centres that can no longer compete on price. In that sense, the vendor cluster maps both the failure of formal employment and the residual purchasing power of people who have not stopped needing to eat.
Keep Reading
- Mthuli Ncube abandons struggling consumers
- Fears of jobs carnage as crisis deepens
- Fresh warning over bank rate hikes
- In Conversation with Trevor: ‘Zim must invest in human capital’
What vendors sell, and where it comes from, is the second layer of the story. A Zimbabwean manufacturing sector at 52,3% capacity utilisation, as recorded by the Confederation of Zimbabwe Industries 2024 Annual Manufacturing Sector Survey, is a sector running at half-speed at best.
The CZI's own chief executive described the situation in April 2025 as trending towards de-industrialisation, noting that manufacturing's contribution to GDP had fallen from an average of 23% across the 1980s to under 10% today. The sector that was meant to fill the shelves and supply the vendors is, structurally, absent from much of its own domestic market.
The result is visible at the roadside. Walk the length of a Harare bus stop and the goods on display reflect a simple cost structure: those manufactured elsewhere and transported in are cheaper than most of what Zimbabwe's remaining factories can produce and sell at the pavement price point. Clothing, household goods, processed foods, and personal care products sourced from China, South Africa, and other regional import markets dominate. Local processed goods, where they appear at all, tend to occupy a narrower range and a higher price relative to the import equivalents. The vendor is not making an ideological choice. They are responding to a cost differential that Zimbabwean producers, operating at half-capacity with expensive electricity, expensive credit, and a volatile currency environment, cannot close.
The CZI's 2024 manufacturing survey, conducted across 402 firms drawn from an estimated 4 552 companies with at least ten employees, documented a second consecutive year of declining capacity utilisation, from 53,2% in 2023 to 52,3% in 2024. The survey identified the main constraints as the high cost of production, obsolete technology, limited financing, high tax compliance costs, persistent electricity shortages, currency instability, and competition from the informal sector. The last item on that list is notable: formal manufacturers are listing informal traders, supplied predominantly by imported goods, as a structural competitive threat.
Manufacturing's share of GDP had already declined from 14,8% in 2018 to under 10% by 2025. The sector contributed an average of 23% of GDP across the 1980s. That contraction represents, cumulatively, the destruction of the productive capacity that would otherwise have generated the formal employment that did not materialise, and that would have supplied the domestic goods that instead arrive by the truckload from Johannesburg, Durban, or Guangzhou.
The CZI noted that if Zimbabwe could unlock 50% of idle manufacturing capacity, the sector's contribution to GDP could rise from 11% to approximately 15%. The corollary is that the idle half of installed industrial capacity represents not just lost output, but lost employment, lost tax revenue, and lost supply chains for the domestic goods that are not appearing on the vendor's tray. The roadside stall, stocked with imported products, is not the cause of deindustrialisation. It is its most legible symptom.
Academic research on Zimbabwe's deindustrialisation has documented the role of Chinese import penetration with particular detail in the textiles and clothing sectors. Studies published by Nathan Mugumisi and others have traced how the combination of cheap Chinese clothing and structural failures in the Zimbabwean investment environment dismantled what had been a significant labour-intensive manufacturing base, one that disproportionately employed women and lower-skilled workers. The sector had effectively collapsed by 2015, with companies either folding or relocating.
What replaced locally produced clothing on the vendor's table was an import. What replaced locally assembled electronics was an import. What replaced domestically processed food was frequently an import, or an informally repackaged version of one. The goods most commonly traded through the roadside sector are those with the lowest domestic production cost relative to their import price, which in most categories means the import wins. That calculation is not unique to Zimbabwe. What makes Zimbabwe's version of it particularly sharp is the speed and depth of the productive collapse that preceded it.
South African goods occupy a specific position in this landscape. South Africa remains Zimbabwe's dominant trading partner, and proximity, rand pricing in periods of ZWL weakness, and existing logistics networks make South African processed goods structurally competitive in a way that even some Chinese imports cannot match for perishables and fast-moving consumer goods. The vendor selling biscuits, chips, or sweets at a Bulawayo terminus is often selling something manufactured in Gauteng or the Western Cape. That is not a commentary on South African goods. It is a commentary on the cost of making the same thing in Zimbabwe.
Zimbabwe's official GDP growth rate for 2024 was estimated at 2%, a significant contraction from 5.3 per cent in 2023, constrained primarily by the El Nino drought's 15 per cent contraction of agricultural output. Wholesale and retail trade grew by 5,1%, mining by 2,3%, and manufacturing by 2% within those aggregate figures. A reading of the headline numbers conveys an economy under pressure but still growing.
What it does not convey is that the growth in wholesale and retail trade is substantially driven by informal commerce. It does not convey that manufacturing is growing at 2% while running at 52,3% of capacity. It does not convey that 83,4% of employed persons earn less than US$362 per month, with nearly a third earning under US$90. And it does not convey that the jobs the economy is producing are disproportionately informal, casual, and dependent on selling imported goods to other people who are themselves informally employed.
The CPI, meanwhile, measures price changes across a consumption basket. In an economy where a majority of consumption occurs outside registered retail channels, the basket's composition and the price points it captures are subject to measurement difficulties that Zimbabwe's statisticians acknowledge. Informal prices, vendor margins, and the exchange rates at which imported goods are effectively priced at the point of street sale do not map cleanly onto official inflation measures. The gap between what official data reports and what people experience in day-to-day purchasing is a consistent source of political friction in Zimbabwe, and it is rooted in precisely this structural divergence.