In ED’s universe, people are secondary to keeping grip on power

“THE welfare of the people is the highest law,” goes a  popular Latin maxim by  Roman philosopher Marcus Tullius Cicero – who lived in the period 106BC to 43BC – that has been adopted by several cities and towns in the United Kingdom and the United States, and emblazoned on their crests. 

By NewsDay

It contends that the safety and welfare of people is the utmost responsibility of the political leaders.

In a review of the Crisis and Constitutionalism: Roman Political Thought from the Fall of the Republic to the Age of Revolution, by Benjamin Straumann; New York: Oxford University Press, 2016, David Dyzenhaus says even “constitutionally-entrenched rights afford people only a limited protection against the State”. 

“When the safety of the people is under threat in an emergency situation, the law that governs is not the law of legally entrenched rights, but a judgment by some powerful office holder, for example, the President, about what it takes to secure the safety of the people. Rights are, therefore, neither inalienable nor illimitable since some body or person may legitimately strip people of their rights or severely limit their rights in at least one kind of situation, the situation of an emergency.”

So, last month, Zimbabwe found itself in the grip of civil unrest after President Emmerson Mnangagwa raised the prices of fuel by 150%, triggering another round of price increases of goods and services.

Wages, meanwhile, did not move an inch as government continues to hold on to the fallacy that its bond note currency enjoys the same value as the United States dollar.  

As the stayway, called for by the Zimbabwe Congress of Trade Unions, became violent (the jury is still out on how the spontaneous violence broke out countrywide or if a very visible third force was behind the riots), Mnangagwa’s government made a call to justify Cicero’s theory that in times of political stress, people should not count on the law and the Constitution to save them. 

So Mnangagwa called in the army who, according to human rights groups, killed 12 people while nearly 90 were treated for gunshot wounds.

A thousand others were beaten to within inches of their lives and churches and hospitals became sanctuaries for the violence victims.

Witnesses say the atrocities included night-time raids on homes of and arbitrary assaults of alleged protesters, while many women were allegedly raped by the marauding soldiers.


All this was perfectly legit, said Mnangagwa.

“We have been accused of using disproportionate force, but these protesters were burning down police stations and various infrastructure including toll-gates along our highways,” he told journalists on Wednesday last week.

Reports suggest that only two police stations were destroyed during the protests – in Marondera and Makoni while the Skyline tollgate along the Beatrice Road was razed.

So the price to pay for such destruction was 12 lives, according to human rights groups (or three according to a police account) and more then, Mr President.

In Zimbabwe, there is no worse label than being labelled mini Robert Mugabe.

But in the 14 months since Mnangagwa took over the Presidency after the military pushed Mugabe out, he is outdoing his mentor in cruelty stakes.

3 Comments

  1. Fine, go on you western puppets and propagandists. It is understandable since you are being paid for it. But one thing for sure, you can never fool everyone. People should be allowed to trigger violent civil unrest and the low enforcement agents must just sit and watch! What reasoning! But let me remind this dull propagandist that that puanishing of criminals is clearly enshrined in our constitution. You also need to be reminded that you are in the group of those criminals because of your inciting propaganda that you are paid for by your western colonial masters.

  2. Wezhira Wezhara

    Very true indeed @ Farai Nhire. I am surprised this paper is more worried about people who incited violence, committed arsons and looted shops yet it does not sympathize with those who were victims of such actions. I stay in Chitungwiza in Unit G Extention and to me only people who were involved in the violent protests were affected. These include those in Unit F, A,B, C , St Marys. These people were raided to arrest the culprits most of whom stay in these locations. Recoveries of looted properties were done. Now people should not hide behind fuel increases. That is a lie. The demos were meant for regime change as evidenced by the address by Godfrey Sithole (MP Chitown North-MDC). They wanted to prevent Mnangagwa from landing, not that they wanted him to reduce fuel prices.

  3. I am rather surprised that most people seem to miss the irony of the pot calling the kettle black as the proverbial saying goes. We accuse the administration of holding the people hostage by instruments of the state to stay in power and yet willingly ignore or even champion the opposition doing the same via calling on their Western backers not to support efforts to turn around the economy and improve the lives of the people for them to achieve power. No one can lay a valid claim to the interests of the people in this scenario. If we are genuine that the interests of the people are paramount, then all parties need to be held to the same standard. Just saying….

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *