Somebody said a Chinese student who goes to study business in the West will return home and do business the Chinese way. An Indian student will do the same.
By CHARLES DHEWA
It is not yet clear whether an African business student will also come back home and conduct business the African way. While business principles may remain the same across the globe, local nuances are increasingly determining the difference between growth and stagnation, success and failure.
Responding to opportunities through social capital
If it is true that Chinese, Indians and other races are good at tapping into their values and social capital in responding to business opportunities. Africans have a lot of work to do in that direction. When an African businessman dies, his belongings, including businesses and assets are shared between his children and surviving spouses.
If he was a farmer with several wives, his farm will be divided among the surviving spouses and children. One son takes a tractor, the other a disk harrow, the other a truck, the other a grinding mill. The other child or wife may inherit a fruit tree plantation while another gets a processing plant. This means a business that used to operate as single unit becomes fragmented into pieces that no longer cohere. On the contrary, when a Jewish or Indian businessman dies, customers do not even see any change. Everything continues to operate as before and the customer base is extended to the next generation.
Globalising local food systems
Although they may be immersed in the same business curriculum, the way children from different backgrounds respond to business opportunities is influenced by their social capital. In a rapidly globalising and competitive world, culture and social capital are becoming a fundamental base for niche markets.
People who know about a unique food system tied to their culture are the ones who can promote it among other cultures.
When an African takes his/her food system to England, Australia or USA, s/he becomes an ambassador for the food system from his/her community back home.
That can be the genesis of a new food business. A lot of nutritious food in developing communities remain marginalised because people from these communities who have gone to cities and overseas are not doing anything to globalise their culture through their food system.
Nigerians are in the forefront of taking their food system wherever they go. Other Africans are fond of despising their food and embracing foreign dishes. Eating at a Chinese restaurant is considered more prestigious than eating at an African restaurant.
Cultivating a unique customer base
Instead of being abused through partisan politics, the notion of clans and tribes can be a powerful tool in advancing culturally-rooted agribusinesses to other parts of the globe. If the Italian pizza has been globalised, why not the Ethiopian njera, famous Ndebele food known as mxhanxa or other delicacies from other African cultures. When tourists visit Africa, they do not want to eat what they already eat at home, but taste unique African food.
Africans cannot continue blaming modernisation for fragmenting their communities when some cultures are turning modernisation and globalisation to their favour.
Nothing prevents African youths who leave rural communities for the city or foreign countries to return home and explore unique business opportunities. Many clans and polygamous networks are so strong as to constitute a big market for business ventures. An aspiring business person should count his/her own clansmen and relatives as the first customer base. Luckily, African informal markets are showing some of the possibilities in transforming social capital into resilient business outcomes through trust and relationships.
New roles for African chambers of commerce
African chambers of commerce tend to be concentrated in capital cities with no extension to rural areas and cultures that should be a source of distinctiveness for different members.
Foreign direct investment, knowledge and other forms of capital will not take African businesses far without curiosity and social capital, which are becoming more sources of value. Knowledge is power, but curiosity pulls the trigger.
Most African chambers of commerce continue to pay lip service to knowledge and evidence gathering.
Chambers of commerce should articulate the capacity of their industrial entities and their raw material expectations that have to be matched with production. It is through evidence that the capacity of an entire sector like the milling industry can be known.
In several African countries, the small to medium enterprises (SME) sector has emerged as a strong competitor for the big milling industry. It means chambers of commerce representing the big industry have to accurately assess and understand the SME sector as a serious competitor.
For instance, in the maize milling or peanut processing business, there are now many people operating grinding mills and peanut butter processing mills in both urban high-density areas and rural communities, posing direct competition to big traditional millers who used to dominate the food processing sector.
If more than 60% of the milling market share has gone to SMEs, who are big millers milling for? Gathering evidence will guide big millers to change their business models unlike pretending they still command a big market share when in fact it has been eroded by small players.
Evidence will also demonstrate the extent to which consumers are moving from tinned beans and tinned fish to pre-cooked beans and dried fish.
The expansion of SME actors into rural business centres also mean raw materials that used to flow to big millers in cities are now being intercepted by small SMEs at growth points and rural business centres whose advantages include proximity to production areas and flexibility in handling smaller quantities. For example, groundnuts are being intercepted by small peanut butter producers at rural business centres. Rural electrification initiatives are exacerbating this trend.
Going beyond buying raw materials from farmers
Farmers are now beginning to ask what other additional services or benefits are being offered by big companies. They are seeking relationships that go beyond buying raw commodities from farmers. That means big companies should innovate by coming across as guarantors to farmers so that they can access inputs and finance.
Gone are the days when big companies would just wait to buy when the farmer had produced alone using self-financing and grappling with many challenges. Big companies cannot continue to be price setters for cattle and other commodities whose production they will not have supported. That is why farmers end up preferring open markets where the laws of demand and supply prevail.
Are big companies offering knowledge and information?
In a dynamic economy characterised by climate change and other negatives, farmers are no longer interested in future contracts. Where contract farming is happening, why do contractors look for the best farmers who already have access to resources?
Should they not be looking for under-resourced farmers as a way of broadening the supply base? By supporting the well up, big companies widen the gap between the rich and the poor who end up continuing to be labourers when they need a graduation pathway that can see them growing out of poverty. When potential players are excluded due to lack of resources, production for industries suffers and narrows.