Nugatory politics, pernickety in Zim discourse

I AM not the first to write about it and I, definitely, won’t be the last. It well is a given that what we are seeing happening in Zimbabwean society and in political parties in particular is nothing new. This has been part of human history from the past to the present and on into the future.

MUTSA MURENJE

The late Masipula Sithole made this observation in his widely read book Struggles-within-the-struggle.

I do not, however, intend to focus on in-fights per se. This little contribution is based on the thesis that by focusing on the nugatory we have become obsessed with matters that do not at all benefit and improve the well-being of the people of Zimbabwe.

On in-fights, Sithole wrote thus: “They are a fact of political life, a part of the dynamic of human organisation. Nothing will be gained by assuming or even wishing the contrary. Where human beings are involved with one another and interact directly or indirectly, conflict, tension, and struggle are bound to exist and describe the relationships. This is true in a family, be it consisting only of husband and wife; true in a church organisation; in a school; in a social club; you name it. Contradictions are a given in social and political life.”

GEORGE CHARAMBA

George Charamba

We have had a dozen political parties since independence. Most of these were founded by those who at one time have been members of the nonce ruling party Zanu PF. They each claimed to present a credible opposition to the cupid and out-of-touch-with-reality party, but their success has been limited in both scale and scope. I am of the viewpoint that opposition political parties have themselves contributed to this situation. They are petty and have lost the bigger picture. We can’t all be presidents all at once. The presidency isn’t the most important thing that we can all think of because genuine patriots can still be useful to their country even as ordinary citizens. We don’t need to have held political office for us to be recognised.

Having said the foregoing, I would now like to draw your attention to the fact that our suffering people benefit nothing from our gobbledegook. There has been and always will be an attempt to show off our language abilities so as to excite and interest the public. What tangible benefits do we draw from scathing, vitriolic, acerbic and indeed frontal criticism from politicians against other politicians?

As citizens, we have the right to question the partisan role played by presidential spokesperson George Charamba and every other civil servant wearing a political hat. The expectation is in private life, as in industry, the individual must advance his own enlightened self-interest-within the law — in order to achieve overall progress. But in public life we expect individuals to sacrifice their private interests to permit the national good to progress.

I have learnt a lesson or two from South African politics. Regardless of one’s age or provenance, every young person is capable of realising his full potential. I attribute this to the presence of democracy in that country. In our own country, dissent is stifled and political parties do not encourage open discussions on leadership. If we allow people to freely discuss issues of poverty, inequality and unemployment then the same should be done on the issue of leadership. The factional and succession fights are no doubt an attempt to be heard.

However, these have pernicious effects on individuals and political parties involved. The same effects can affect the nation as a whole and this is the prime motif why I thought of coming up with this contribution.

We don’t eat War Veterans minister Christopher Mutsvangwa’s vocabulary neither do we benefit anything from the underwear he allegedly stole during the liberation struggle. Higher Education Jonathan Moyo’s parentage has nothing to do with our quotidian struggles. This is the same message that MDC leader Welshman Ncube fails to understand that political rigidity has deleterious effects. Elton Mangoma and Tendai Biti focused more on MDC-T Morgan Tsvangirai’s alleged personal weaknesses rather than the bigger picture and thus, failed to capitalise on the potential that can be drawn from working with him. Lovemore Madhuku also believes that it is better for him to lead than to be led.

As for Egypt Dzinemunhenzva, I still find it puzzling how he intends to govern our country and address the complex problems we are facing. I sincerely hope that Simba Makoni and Dumiso Dabengwa are paying attention to these developments so that Zimbabwe can truly be what she possibly can be. In pari materia, the expulsion of former Vice-President Joice Mujuru from Zanu PF did not help maintain a single centre of power. There are still a number of factions albeit built on selfish and parochial goals.

We are looking for wholesome changes in our politics, changes which are capable of restoring us to the community of nations while at the same time transforming us from our current status of “a basket case” to a “breadbasket” status that we have been known to be in the not-too-distant-past. Zimbabwe’s economy was at one time second to that of South Africa in the African continent. We have gone astray and the time has come for us to retrace our steps to where we went astray and resume our journey from there.

Zimbabweans are still worried about poverty and lack of educational opportunities and other basic social services such as water, electricity, housing and sanitation. We still expect accountability and democracy on the part of our leaders.

We want to reach a stage where we will all say ethnic intolerance, the abuse of human rights on a massive scale, the monopolisation of political and economic power, refusal to respect democracy or the results of free and fair elections, resistance to popular participation in governance and poor management of public affairs have no place in our country.

Rather, there is an incumbent need to promote unity and peace in the nation for the benefit and well-being of all the people of Zimbabwe. Our leaders must ensure protection of fundamental human rights and freedoms as well respect the diversity of the people and communities of Zimbabwe. I put it to you.

7 Responses to Nugatory politics, pernickety in Zim discourse

  1. Biggie Taapatsi February 9, 2016 at 9:47 am #

    “Most of these (opposition parties) were founded by those who at one time have been members of the once ruling party Zanu PF”. So which is the ruling party now, Mr Expert?

    “Zimbabwe’s economy was at one time second to that of South Africa in the African continent”. When was this, Mr Expert?

    “Elton Mangoma and Tendai Biti focused more on MDC-T Morgan Tsvangirai’s alleged personal weaknesses rather than the bigger picture and thus, failed to capitalise on the potential that can be drawn from working with him. Lovemore Madhuku also believes that it is better for him to lead than to be led.” So I take it the only politician who doesn’t need advice is Morgan Tsvangirai.

    This article is so pathetic.

  2. Chimedzanemburungwe February 9, 2016 at 9:55 am #

    Very good piece but the following could have been better expressed in simpler English -pernicious effects,gobbledegook, quotidian struggles, pari materia …

    • Ring Master February 9, 2016 at 2:56 pm #

      Some of these articles are meant to also showcase how much reading was has done hence unusual words.

  3. NCA party member February 9, 2016 at 10:23 am #

    this is rubbish, no point, besides the jargon that nobody understands, why do you have to insult other people who have formed their parties. Does attacking other parties make your Morgan Tsvangirai win elections, you are a lost soul you need help. If you are a member of the MDC just focus on your party and stop attacking our parties because they have nothing to do with you.

  4. plebian February 9, 2016 at 10:35 am #

    “The ides
    of March are come”

  5. fatso February 9, 2016 at 12:54 pm #

    @NCA. your response is more vicious than the attack in the article. This is the point the writer is making, thar our politics is petty. When are u guys going to mature?

  6. Tino February 9, 2016 at 2:35 pm #

    I like this article. It dwells on the politics of divide and rule being expertly implemented by ZANU-PF. The syndrome of all us wanting to rule, as demonstrated by opposition splinter groups, is what enabled Kenya’s Daniel Arap Moi to stay in power for as long as he did. Eventually the opposition realized their folly, got united and kicked out the dictator. Today Kenya, though riddled with corruption and attacks by terrorist groups, is making unprecedented economic progress. The opposition in Zimbabwe will struggle to dethrone Mugabe even when it is united. When it is divided the 92 year old dictator, who obviously abuses state machinery, will walk over them.

© 2016 NewsDay Zimbabwe. All Rights Reserved.

DMMA logo