‘High risk scaring investors for $50m project’


PLANS by Rio Tinto Zimbabwe (RioZim) to set up a $50 million power generation plant at Sengwa in Gokwe North with a capacity to produce 4 000 megawatts are being hampered by the high country risk which scared away potential investors, a top company official has said.


RioZim chief executive officer Noah Matimba yesterday told the Parliamentary Portfolio Committee on Mines and Energy chaired by Lovemore Matuke that in order to instill investor confidence, RioZim would seek partnership with Eskom and Nampower as they had credible portfolios and good balance sheets.

“Sengwa can produce 4 000 megawatts and this plant can actually develop major power that can be exported to other Sadc countries because the coal that is produced at Sengwa is not worth exporting, but we can create value out of the poor quality coal and create power that we can sell to the region,” Matimba said.

“The total grant of coal resources granted to Rio Tinto amount to 1,36 billion tonnes and Sengwa resources amount to 519 metric tonnes of coal, and approximately $20 million has been spent on this particular exercise.”

He said between 2010 and 2012 several regulatory grants had been issued to Sengwa, adding the project failed to take off since 2004 due to lack of credible investors despite that 20 Chinese investors had made enquiries.

“The feasibility studies discovered we can establish 1 400 megawatts per station and the area is 40 hectares in Gokwe North and the electricity is to be exported to Harare and other centres. Cooling will be required and the intention is to pipe water from Kariba,” he said.

Matimba said they could not rely on water from Sengwa River because it could dry up.

He said power from Sengwa would augment Zesa’s output which currently stands at 1 260 megawatts.

“In 10 years, the Southern Africa Power Pool will increase by more than 32%, which is equivalent to 13 000 megawatts.
Unfortunately, there has not been corresponding investment in generation and transmission infrastructure,” Matimba said.
He said to take advantage of this opportunity, RioZim planned to invest in mine development, coal supply business, power station development and power generation.

“Instead of mining and exporting coal, we need to value-add the cheap coal by exporting power. However, the challenges include setting up the portfolio of purchasers. Key financiers for the project expect to see bankable offtake as part of the proposal before they commit to funding the project.”

He said chances were that the project would be bankable if partnerships existed with Eskom, Nanpower and such like utilities whose risks would be acceptable to lenders.


    • Responsible journalism is always crucial. Do not misinform the public by not doing your homework fully. How can $50mil buy 4000MW?

    • True this is fiction 50million is a drop in the ocean for a project of this mangnitude.

  1. ..thats a blatant lie i thought $50m was just for the feasibility study not for setting up a 4000MW power plant. Building castles in the air huh??Zimbabwe needs true Energy Risk Professionals to help in such issues.

  2. it can be fiction, blatant lie or journalist sour grapes, that project wont survive the indigenisation ALBATROSS.

  3. Either journalism has gone to the dogs or Rio Tinto are taking people for a ride, there is absolutely now way you are going to even do the foundations for a power plant with $50m

  4. People, do not waste your time on figures but on the real issues why licensed IPPs are not producing power? The parliamentary committee should call the regulator to answer this question of substance and not let her leave without a credible action plan to reverse the situation? We need power not excuses????

  5. If adding of 600MW at Hwange costs more than a billion dollars, how can the construction of a greenfield Gokwe North cost a mere $50M?
    Why is Rio Tinto scratching its head for such a paltry amount? Surely it can easily borrow from local banks and would not have taken them this long to construct the Power Station.
    At such riducously low cost the word ‘load shedding’ should not be in any Zimbabwean’s vocabulary.
    We expert journalists to be meticulous in their work.

Comments are closed.