AFTER more than a year of stalling and name-calling, President Robert Mugabe and his Zanu PF party, locked in an unhappy ruling coalition with Morgan Tsvangirai and the MDC-T, have agreed to hold a referendum on a new constitution on March 16.
The Economist
Since all Zimbabwe’s main parties have endorsed the document, it is almost certain to be adopted by a big majority.
That in turn should pave the way for general and presidential elections within a few months, certainly by the end of the year. If the elections are free and fair, they could finally spell the end of the 89-year-old Mugabe’s 33-year reign.
Really? Few Zimbabweans think Mugabe and his party’s leading lights, especially the military and security men who have come to dominate his party, would ever consider ceding power — whatever a new constitution may say to Tsvangirai and his friends, whom they still excoriate as traitors.
The heads of the armed forces, police and prison service have insisted that they will never serve under a President Tsvangirai.
Even in the past few weeks, the brutally ubiquitous Central Intelligence Organisation and police have been arresting, beating up or harassing leaders of civic groups such as Women of Zimbabwe Arise and the Zimbabwe Peace Project, and ransacking the offices of the Zimbabwe Election Support Network, the most assiduous and valiant of the independent monitoring groups.
In a bizarre move, the police also announced a ban on radios that are incompatible with State-owned stations which routinely vilify the MDC-T. Such stations have become popular in rural areas where more people are listening to foreign-beamed broadcasts hostile to Mugabe and Zanu-PF.
- Chamisa under fire over US$120K donation
- Mavhunga puts DeMbare into Chibuku quarterfinals
- Pension funds bet on Cabora Bassa oilfields
- Councils defy govt fire tender directive
Keep Reading
“We have information that some unpatriotic individuals are distributing radios in rural areas,” said the police spokesperson.
“We have arrested some people and confiscated such devices.”
The new constitution has itself been widely criticised by an array of independent lawyers as flawed, though better than its predecessor. The President is to be limited to two four-year terms in office and his powers checked by a sturdier parliament, though there will be no Prime minister.
But for most people that is beside the point. With the endorsement of both Zanu PF and the various factions of the MDC, it is almost sure to sail through. Its real import is that it will pave the way for elections that each side thinks it can win.
Who is right? If there were a level playing field, Tsvangirai’s MDC-T would almost certainly prevail as it did last time round in 2008, despite every sort of skulduggery and violence perpetrated by the ruling party and the security forces.
In the event, under the jaundiced eye of a fiddling electoral commission packed with Mugabe loyalists, the MDC’s two wings were still able to get 51% of the vote for Parliament against Zanu PF’s 46%, while Tsvangirai got 48% of the vote in the first round of the presidential contest against Mugabe’s 43%, before the MDC-T man was bludgeoned into bottling out of the run-off.
In any event, the MDC-T’s sheen has dulled and some of its ministers have been as incompetent and even on occasion as venal as Zanu PF ones.
Opinion polls suggest that the MDC-T’s popularity has fallen, though it still holds sway in the towns. It may do less well in the rural areas, where poor peasants can more easily be intimidated and suborned by Zanu PF heavies.
In the past year, the level of state-orchestrated violence against MDC people has fallen, but many fear it could rise again as an election draws near.
Zanu PF’s coffers have been filled by illegal earnings from the Marange diamond fields, so largesse may briefly be lavished on rural folk.
The electoral roll, replete with dead people and false names, may be manipulated by Zanu-PF to its own ends. But the MDC-T still benefits merely from not being Zanu-PF, which is still widely viewed as corrupt, incompetent, brutal and in thrall to an ageing tyrant.
Moreover, since 2009, when the Zimbabwe currency was replaced by the United States dollar, the economy, though still dreadful, has grown sharply (by 8% last year), inflation is under control (4% at last count) and schools and hospitals have been restocked with medicine and textbooks.
People are a bit better off. Tsvangirai is often regarded as erratic and liable to be outwitted by Mugabe, but he is still admired for his guts in taking on a ruthless State machine and refusing, against the odds, to be crushed by it.Though Zanu PF’s bosses and Mugabe will be as determined as ever to ensure that the MDC is prevented from winning another election, some factors may be against them. In particular, the regional dynamic may have shifted against Mugabe and his party.
In the past, the Southern African Development Community (Sadc), an influential 15-country club, has cravenly indulged Mugabe’s electoral chicanery. But under President Jacob Zuma of South Africa, it has been tiring of him.
The new deputy head and likely next leader of South Africa’s ruling African National Congress, Cyril Ramaphosa, a former trade unionist tu. If Sadc were at last to tell Mr Mugabe roundly to go, he might find it hard to ignore the call.
In the end, if his security men refuse to let him stand down, a messy compromise may emerge, with Tsvangirai and the MDC-T gaining more clout than before, but in some kind of alliance with a faction of Zanu PF led by the country’s vice-president, Joice Mujuru.
Her husband, Solomon, once head of Mugabe’s guerrilla army, died two years ago in a mysterious fire as he may have been putting out feelers to Tsvangirai. Mugabe may even—who knows? — agree to some dignified mid-term retirement, if he lasts that long.
